Link to the University of Pittsburgh Homepage
Link to the University Library System Homepage Link to the Contact Us Form

A Political Decision Making Process on Curriculum Reform in Mathematics in Secondary Schools That Have Not AchievedAdequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Status

Ferko, Brad (2005) A Political Decision Making Process on Curriculum Reform in Mathematics in Secondary Schools That Have Not AchievedAdequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Status. Doctoral Dissertation, University of Pittsburgh. (Unpublished)

PDF ( A Political Decision Making Process on Curriculum Reform in Mathematics in Secondary Schools That Have Not Achieved Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Status)
Primary Text

Download (766kB) | Preview
PDF (Backup PDF of ETD)
Supplemental Material

Download (859kB) | Preview


Dissertation AbstractThis research was conducted using a multi-case study analysis of four school districts in Western Pennsylvania. All four of the school districts were placed under the guidelines of the Educational Empowerment Act (Act 16) due to a history of low tests scores and poor student achievement. These school districts were also place on the State's Warning List due to the fact that they did not meet the measurable objectives of Adequate Yearly Placement (AYP) on the PSSA. This research focused on strategies used in the four schools in order to improve student performance on the mathematics section of the eleventh grade PSSA.This research utilized a variety of strategies in the process of data collection; interviews, a review of the school district report card as listed with the Pennsylvania Department of Education, a review of newspaper articles, and discussions with my research advisor used in the triangulization process of the data in order to provide case studies that contained depth and would provide a more accurate account of the phenomena that occurred within the districts. In the interview process in all four districts, a member of the central office administration, a member of the building level administration, and a secondary mathematics teacher were interviewed in order to provide accounts of improvement efforts for student achievement from a variety of personnel responsible for decision-making. In order to limit the amount of error within the interview process a documenter was used to provide assistance, as well as all of the interviews were taped. This proved a great deal of assistance in the interpretation of data collected during the interview.Through the research and the analysis of data this researcher was able to provide several conclusion; funds provided from Act 16 that were used to improve student achievement were most useful when the districts involved worked collaboratively with all educational stakeholders in the development of a long range plan to improve student achievement in mathematics; often districts are unable to maintain consistency in teaching and administrative staff and this has a negative effect on student achievement; and there are a variety of "pre-packaged" programs that are available for district purchase, each district must review these programs with all members of the staff and then decide which programs meet their needs.


Social Networking:
Share |


Item Type: University of Pittsburgh ETD
Status: Unpublished
CreatorsEmailPitt UsernameORCID
ETD Committee:
TitleMemberEmail AddressPitt UsernameORCID
Committee ChairGorman, Charlesgorman@pitt.eduGORMAN
Committee MemberKent, Charleskent@pitt.eduKENT
Committee MemberCohen, Martinmpc2@pitt.eduMPC2
Committee MemberMcClure, Maureenmcclure@pitt.eduMCCLURE
Date: 28 April 2005
Date Type: Completion
Defense Date: 19 March 2004
Approval Date: 28 April 2005
Submission Date: 5 December 2004
Access Restriction: No restriction; Release the ETD for access worldwide immediately.
Institution: University of Pittsburgh
Schools and Programs: School of Education > Administrative and Policy Studies
Degree: EdD - Doctor of Education
Thesis Type: Doctoral Dissertation
Refereed: Yes
Uncontrolled Keywords: Adequate Yearly Progress; Mathematics; Political Reform Process
Other ID:, etd-12052004-161018
Date Deposited: 10 Nov 2011 20:08
Last Modified: 15 Nov 2016 13:53


Monthly Views for the past 3 years

Plum Analytics

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item