Caloia, Brett
(2012)
Self-Knowledge, Rationality and Interpretation.
Doctoral Dissertation, University of Pittsburgh.
(Unpublished)
Abstract
A central concern in the philosophy of mind for the past half-century has been interpretation: what mental states should I attribute to someone else? Quine argued that providing a translation of an alien language required seeing that language as logically structured. Davidson and Lewis took this idea further. They argued that the project of providing a translation was part of a larger project of providing an interpretation of the subject. To interpret was to attribute mental states that made the subject‟s behavior rational. Thus they replaced the injunction to see the subject‟s language as conforming to logical laws with a broader principle of charity. The principle of charity constrains the activity of interpretation by the untenable assumption that the subject is rational.
I propose replacing charity‟s injunction to maximize rationality with a principle that directs an interpreter to minimize inexplicable behavior. The positive argument for this new principle emerges from two sources. The first is empirical: there is a great deal of evidence that human beings are simply not all that rational. Moreover, their irrationality is predictable and operates in fairly well understood ways. The second is first-personal: each of us is aware of a variety of irrational tendencies in our own thought. These sources can be drawn on to make sense of behavior without offering a rational reconstruction. I understand why my frustrated colleague yells at his computer, in part, because I know what it means to be frustrated.
I argue that taking a first-personal account of the subject seriously will mean seeing that the subject might consciously make transitions in thought that are not beholden to a rational ideal. The interpreter may use his own first-personal experience as a model for understanding the subject. This expands the evidential base beyond the observational. Doing this makes it is possible to recognize something as thought without seeing it as held in place by the rational ideal of the network.
Share
Citation/Export: |
|
Social Networking: |
|
Details
Item Type: |
University of Pittsburgh ETD
|
Status: |
Unpublished |
Creators/Authors: |
|
ETD Committee: |
Title | Member | Email Address | Pitt Username | ORCID |
---|
Committee CoChair | Machamer, Peter | | | | Committee CoChair | Thompson, M | | | | Committee Member | Schafer, K | | | | Committee Member | Setiya, K | | | | Committee Member | Machery, E | | | |
|
Date: |
31 January 2012 |
Date Type: |
Publication |
Defense Date: |
22 August 2011 |
Approval Date: |
31 January 2012 |
Submission Date: |
30 November 2011 |
Access Restriction: |
No restriction; Release the ETD for access worldwide immediately. |
Number of Pages: |
133 |
Institution: |
University of Pittsburgh |
Schools and Programs: |
Dietrich School of Arts and Sciences > Philosophy |
Degree: |
PhD - Doctor of Philosophy |
Thesis Type: |
Doctoral Dissertation |
Refereed: |
Yes |
Uncontrolled Keywords: |
Radical Interpretation, Self-Knowledge, Rationality, Emotion |
Date Deposited: |
31 Jan 2012 15:47 |
Last Modified: |
15 Nov 2016 13:55 |
URI: |
http://d-scholarship.pitt.edu/id/eprint/10606 |
Metrics
Monthly Views for the past 3 years
Plum Analytics
Actions (login required)
 |
View Item |