Wills, Vanessa Marx and Morality. Doctoral Dissertation, University of Pittsburgh.
Abstract
Several influential interpretations of Marx claim his theory of social change is amoral, that Marx had only an incoherent moral conception, or that Marx had moral commitments early in his career but abandoned them, perhaps at the writing of The German Ideology but certainly before Capital. I argue that none of these is correct. Morality, for Marx, is thoroughly historical: it is produced through human activity; whether particular actions or social arrangements are moral or immoral varies at different historical stages; and its realization in human practice and the closure of the gap between "is" and "ought" would lead to the abolition of morality as the theorization of that gap. Marx determines what society would be best for human beings and which existing forces and historical processes could realize it. He morally evaluates social systems, theories, and human actions with respect to whether they promote or inhibit the increase of human beings' rational control over their own environment and social development, and the historical emergence of "rich individuals". Famously, Marx refers to morality as "ideology". Interpreters of Marx have assumed that ideology is always reactionary or misleading. However, ideology plays an important role in the development of revolutionary consciousness. Ideology can serve as a bulwark of reaction; however, Marx shows that the proletariat must develop its own ideology to theorize social contradictions and determine how they can be overcome to allow for a conscious, democratic, and rational control over human beings' social existence. In the first chapter of my dissertation, I provide a detailed overview of Marx's moral theory and its basis in his conception of human nature and alienation. The remainder of the dissertation follows the development of Marx's moral thought chronologically, starting with Marx's early works including The Economic and Philosophic Manuscripts of 1844 and The German Ideology, continuing with the period including works such as The Communist Manifesto and On the Poverty of Philosophy, and ending with Marx's late work including the Grundrisse and Capital. I conclude by drawing together the study's main themes and suggesting avenues for further research.
Share |
| Citation/Export: | |
| Social Networking: | |
|---|
Details |
| Item Type: | University of Pittsburgh ETD |
| ETD Committee: | | ETD Committee Type | Committee Member | Email |
|---|
| Committee Chair | Thompson, Michael | mthompso@pitt.edu | | Committee Member | Machamer, Peter | pkmach@pitt.edu | | Committee Member | McDowell, John | jmcdowel@pitt.edu | | Committee Member | Shelby, Tommie | tshelby@fas.harvard.edu |
|
| Title: | Marx and Morality |
| Status: | Published |
| Abstract: | Several influential interpretations of Marx claim his theory of social change is amoral, that Marx had only an incoherent moral conception, or that Marx had moral commitments early in his career but abandoned them, perhaps at the writing of The German Ideology but certainly before Capital. I argue that none of these is correct. Morality, for Marx, is thoroughly historical: it is produced through human activity; whether particular actions or social arrangements are moral or immoral varies at different historical stages; and its realization in human practice and the closure of the gap between "is" and "ought" would lead to the abolition of morality as the theorization of that gap. Marx determines what society would be best for human beings and which existing forces and historical processes could realize it. He morally evaluates social systems, theories, and human actions with respect to whether they promote or inhibit the increase of human beings' rational control over their own environment and social development, and the historical emergence of "rich individuals". Famously, Marx refers to morality as "ideology". Interpreters of Marx have assumed that ideology is always reactionary or misleading. However, ideology plays an important role in the development of revolutionary consciousness. Ideology can serve as a bulwark of reaction; however, Marx shows that the proletariat must develop its own ideology to theorize social contradictions and determine how they can be overcome to allow for a conscious, democratic, and rational control over human beings' social existence. In the first chapter of my dissertation, I provide a detailed overview of Marx's moral theory and its basis in his conception of human nature and alienation. The remainder of the dissertation follows the development of Marx's moral thought chronologically, starting with Marx's early works including The Economic and Philosophic Manuscripts of 1844 and The German Ideology, continuing with the period including works such as The Communist Manifesto and On the Poverty of Philosophy, and ending with Marx's late work including the Grundrisse and Capital. I conclude by drawing together the study's main themes and suggesting avenues for further research. |
| Defense Date: | 26 August 2011 |
| Approval Date: | 01 February 2012 |
| Submission Date: | 07 December 2011 |
| Release Date: | 01 February 2012 |
| Access Restriction: | No restriction; Release the ETD for access worldwide immediately. |
| Patent pending: | No |
| Number of Pages: | 269 |
| Institution: | University of Pittsburgh |
| Thesis Type: | Doctoral Dissertation |
| Refereed: | Yes |
| Degree: | PhD - Doctor of Philosophy |
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | Marx, morality, moral philosophy, political philosophy, alienation, human nature, history of modern philosophy, Engels, Marxism |
| Schools and Programs: | Dietrich School of Arts and Sciences > Philosophy |
| Date Deposited: | 01 Feb 2012 10:42 |
| Last Modified: | 02 Feb 2012 01:15 |
|---|
Actions (login required)