Link to the University of Pittsburgh Homepage
Link to the University Library System Homepage Link to the Contact Us Form

The role of research in viral disease eradication and elimination programs: Lessons for malaria eradication

Message

Note: This site will be unavailable for a couple hours for scheduled maintenance starting at 3:00 pm EST (UTC-5:00) on Friday, Jan. 28, 2022.

Breman, JG and de Quadros, CA and Dowdle, WR and Foege, WH and Henderson, DA and John, TJ and Levine, MM (2011) The role of research in viral disease eradication and elimination programs: Lessons for malaria eradication. PLoS Medicine, 8 (1). ISSN 1549-1277

[img]
Preview
PDF
Published Version
Available under License : See the attached license file.

Download (135kB) | Preview
[img] Plain Text (licence)
Available under License : See the attached license file.

Download (1kB)

Abstract

By examining the role research has played in eradication or regional elimination initiatives for three viral diseases-smallpox, poliomyelitis, and measles-we derive nine cross-cutting lessons applicable to malaria eradication. In these initiatives, some types of research commenced as the programs began and proceeded in parallel. Basic laboratory, clinical, and field research all contributed notably to progress made in the viral programs. For each program, vaccine was the lynchpin intervention, but as the programs progressed, research was required to improve vaccine formulations, delivery methods, and immunization schedules. Surveillance was fundamental to all three programs, whilst polio eradication also required improved diagnostic methods to identify asymptomatic infections. Molecular characterization of pathogen isolates strengthened surveillance and allowed insights into the geographic source of infections and their spread. Anthropologic, sociologic, and behavioural research were needed to address cultural and religious beliefs to expand community acceptance. The last phases of elimination and eradication became increasingly difficult, as a nil incidence was approached. Any eradication initiative for malaria must incorporate flexible research agendas that can adapt to changing epidemiologic contingencies and allow planning for posteradication scenarios. © 2011 Breman et al.


Share

Citation/Export:
Social Networking:
Share |

Details

Item Type: Article
Status: Published
Creators/Authors:
CreatorsEmailPitt UsernameORCID
Breman, JG
de Quadros, CA
Dowdle, WR
Foege, WH
Henderson, DA
John, TJ
Levine, MM
Date: 21 February 2011
Date Type: Publication
Journal or Publication Title: PLoS Medicine
Volume: 8
Number: 1
DOI or Unique Handle: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1000405
Refereed: Yes
ISSN: 1549-1277
Article Type: Review
MeSH Headings: Africa--epidemiology; Americas--epidemiology; Animals; Communicable Disease Control--organization & administration; Communicable Disease Control--trends; Humans; Malaria--prevention & control; Malaria Vaccines; Measles--epidemiology; Measles--prevention & control; Models, Theoretical; Molecular Epidemiology; Mosquito Control; Poliomyelitis--epidemiology; Poliomyelitis--prevention & control; Politics; Population Surveillance; Research; Smallpox--epidemiology; Smallpox--prevention & control; Socioeconomic Factors; Viral Vaccines; Virus Diseases--prevention & control; World Health; World Health Organization
Other ID: NLM PMC3026693
PubMed Central ID: PMC3026693
PubMed ID: 21311582
Date Deposited: 03 Aug 2012 16:01
Last Modified: 20 Dec 2018 00:55
URI: http://d-scholarship.pitt.edu/id/eprint/13259

Metrics

Monthly Views for the past 3 years

Plum Analytics

Altmetric.com


Actions (login required)

View Item View Item