Galletta, D and Grant, R
(1995)
Silicon supervisors and stress: Merging new evidence from the field.
Accounting, Management and Information Technologies, 5 (3-4).
163 - 183.
ISSN 0959-8022
![[img]](http://d-scholarship.pitt.edu/style/images/fileicons/text_plain.png) |
Plain Text (licence)
Available under License : See the attached license file.
Download (1kB)
|
Abstract
Using computer software to track and evaluate employee performance ("monitoring" or "silicon supervision") continues to be a controversial issue. One area of particular concern is the potential linnk between monitoring and workplace stress. Much of the evidence supporting the link is anecdotal. There are, however, a few empirical studies that seem to indicate a positive correlatin and which subsequently extrapolate a causal relationship from that correlation. At the same time, research results are far from conclusive: for every study demonstrating a link, one can find another that fails to demonstrate such a correlation. Evidence from two studies supported the argument that the link between stress and monitoring is weak, and that it is difficult to infer a significant causal relationship. A lab experiment failed to show increased stress in a monitored environment. A field survey with very high power established only a weak relationship between monitoring and stress. It also provided evidence that the correlation may be predictive, but not explanatory. © 1996.
Share
| Citation/Export: |
|
| Social Networking: |
|
Details
Metrics
Monthly Views for the past 3 years
Plum Analytics
Altmetric.com
Actions (login required)
 |
View Item |
![[feed]](/images/feed-icon-32x32.png){kind=icon}