Link to the University of Pittsburgh Homepage
Link to the University Library System Homepage Link to the Contact Us Form

Effect of backrest height on wheelchair propulsion biomechanics for level and uphill conditions

UNSPECIFIED (2012) Effect of backrest height on wheelchair propulsion biomechanics for level and uphill conditions. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 93 (4). 654 - 659. ISSN 0003-9993

[img] Plain Text (licence)
Available under License : See the attached license file.

Download (1kB)

Abstract

Effect of backrest height on wheelchair propulsion biomechanics for level and uphill conditions. Objective: To evaluate the effect of backrest height on wheelchair propulsion kinematics and kinetics. Design: An intervention study with repeated measures. Setting: University laboratory. Participants: Convenience sample included manual wheelchair users (N=36; 26 men and 10 women) with spinal cord injuries ranging from T8 to L2. Intervention: Participants propelled on a motor-driven treadmill for 2 conditions (level and slope of 3°) at a constant speed of 0.9m/s while using in turn a sling backrest fixed at 40.6cm (16in) high (high backrest) and a lower height set at 50% trunk length (low backrest). Main Outcome Measures: Cadence, stroke angle, peak shoulder extension angle, shoulder flexion/extension range of motion, and mechanical effective force. Results: Pushing with the low backrest height enabled greater range of shoulder motion (P<.01), increased stroke angle (P<.01), push time (P<.01), and reduced cadence (P=.01) regardless of whether the treadmill was level or sloped. Conclusions: A lower cadence can be achieved when pushing with a lower backrest, which decreases the risk of developing upper-limb overuse related injuries. However, postural support, comfort, and other activities of daily living must also be considered when selecting a backrest height for active, long-term wheelchair users. The improvements found when using the low backrest were found regardless of slope type. Pushing uphill demanded significantly higher resultant and tangential force, torque, mechanical effective force, and cadence. © 2012 by the American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine.


Share

Citation/Export:
Social Networking:
Share |

Details

Item Type: Article
Status: Published
Centers: Other Centers, Institutes, or Units > Human Engineering Research Laboratories
Date: 1 April 2012
Date Type: Publication
Journal or Publication Title: Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
Volume: 93
Number: 4
Page Range: 654 - 659
DOI or Unique Handle: 10.1016/j.apmr.2011.10.023
Schools and Programs: School of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences > Rehabilitation Science and Technology
Refereed: Yes
ISSN: 0003-9993
MeSH Headings: Acceleration; Adaptation, Physiological; Adult; Aged; Biomechanics; Equipment Design; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Psychomotor Performance; Range of Motion, Articular--physiology; Spinal Cord Injuries--physiopathology; Torque; Upper Extremity--physiology; Wheelchairs
PubMed ID: 22325682
Date Deposited: 15 Oct 2012 14:17
Last Modified: 05 Jan 2019 16:01
URI: http://d-scholarship.pitt.edu/id/eprint/15776

Metrics

Monthly Views for the past 3 years

Plum Analytics

Altmetric.com


Actions (login required)

View Item View Item