Link to the University of Pittsburgh Homepage
Link to the University Library System Homepage Link to the Contact Us Form

Promotion of Prescription Drugs to Consumers and Providers, 2001-2010

Kornfield, R and Donohue, J and Berndt, ER and Alexander, GC (2013) Promotion of Prescription Drugs to Consumers and Providers, 2001-2010. PLoS ONE, 8 (3).

[img]
Preview
PDF
Published Version
Available under License : See the attached license file.

Download (113kB) | Preview
[img] Plain Text (licence)
Available under License : See the attached license file.

Download (1kB)

Abstract

Background: Pharmaceutical firms heavily promote their products and may have changed marketing strategies in response to reductions in new product approvals, restrictions on some forms of promotion, and the expanding role of biologic therapies. Methods: We used descriptive analyses of annual cross-sectional data from 2001 through 2010 to examine direct-to-consumer advertising (DTCA) (Kantar Media) and provider-targeted promotion (IMS Health and SDI), including: (1) inflation-adjusted total promotion spending ($ and percent of sales); (2) distribution by channel (consumer v. provider); and (3) provider specialty both for the industry as a whole and for top-selling biologic and small molecule therapies. Results: Total promotion peaked in 2004 at US$36.1 billion (13.4% of sales). By 2010 it had declined to $27.7B (9.0% of sales). Between 2006 and 2010, similar declines were seen for promotion to providers and DTCA (both by 25%). DTCA's share of total promotion increased from 12% in 2002 to 18% in 2006, but then declined to 16% and remains highly concentrated. Number of products promoted to providers peaked in 2004 at over 3000, and then declined 20% by 2010. In contrast to top-selling small molecule therapies having an average of $370 million (8.8% of sales) spent on promotion, top biologics were promoted less, with only $33 million (1.4% of sales) spent per product. Little change occurred in the composition of promotion between primary care physicians and specialists from 2001-2010. Conclusions: These findings suggest that pharmaceutical companies have reduced promotion following changes in the pharmaceutical pipeline and patent expiry for several blockbuster drugs. Promotional strategies for biologic drugs differ substantially from small molecule therapies. © 2013 Kornfield et al.


Share

Citation/Export:
Social Networking:
Share |

Details

Item Type: Article
Status: Published
Creators/Authors:
CreatorsEmailPitt UsernameORCID
Kornfield, R
Donohue, Jjdonohue@pitt.eduJDONOHUE
Berndt, ER
Alexander, GC
Date: 4 March 2013
Date Type: Publication
Journal or Publication Title: PLoS ONE
Volume: 8
Number: 3
DOI or Unique Handle: 10.1371/journal.pone.0055504
Schools and Programs: Graduate School of Public Health > Health Policy & Management
School of Medicine > Psychiatry
Refereed: Yes
Other ID: NLM PMC3587616
PubMed Central ID: PMC3587616
PubMed ID: 23469165
Date Deposited: 28 Mar 2013 16:47
Last Modified: 02 Feb 2019 15:55
URI: http://d-scholarship.pitt.edu/id/eprint/17873

Metrics

Monthly Views for the past 3 years

Plum Analytics

Altmetric.com


Actions (login required)

View Item View Item