Lapin , Andrea Dale
(2013)
A Body of Text: Physical Culture and the Marketing of Mobility.
Doctoral Dissertation, University of Pittsburgh.
(Unpublished)
This is the latest version of this item.
Abstract
Drawing on Althusserian notions of ideology and Bourdieu’s understanding of bodily hexis, A Body of Text seeks to reframe Physical Culture as an artifact worthy of serious study, more complex and less reactionary than its beefcake-and-sentiment reputation might suggest. This dissertation addresses the story of Physical Culture magazine from three different perspectives, reading the magazine through lenses of media history, medical history and social context, in order to understand the ways in which class operated on and through the body. In contrast to nearly every other publication in the early twentieth century, Physical Culture suggested that class mobility was possible, and that success would naturally follow improvement of body and health. Whereas the idea of “fitness” in the eugenics movement very clearly indicated an essential condition, consequent to the quality of the germline, Physical Culture initiated the idea that fitness was obtainable – and commodifiable – through diet, exercise and what we now call “lifestyle.”
Much of this argument is constructed by contrasting Physical Culture with Hygeia, the health magazine created by the American Medical Association for a lay audience, and by contrasting Physical Culture impresario Bernarr Macfadden with his counterpart at the AMA, Morris Fishbein. Whereas Macfadden’s story has been told and retold (albeit in biographies that are increasingly interesting but not yet definitive), Fishbein’s story has yet to be the subject of a responsible biography. First gestures in that direction open the door to further work on Fishbein as a subject, and to deeper studies of the relationship between medicine, marketing and modern consumerism. Far from suggesting that Macfadden is ipso facto a liberatory force or a sophisticated theorist, the likeliest explanation for the complex, unstable and evolving constructions of body politics in Physical Culture are twofold: first, coming himself from “unfit” germlines, Macfadden needs to enrich contemporary thinking about the body to make sense of (and room for) his own success; second, and more importantly: you can’t sell a bloodline.
Share
| Citation/Export: |
|
| Social Networking: |
|
Details
| Item Type: |
University of Pittsburgh ETD
|
| Status: |
Unpublished |
| Creators/Authors: |
|
| ETD Committee: |
|
| Date: |
24 July 2013 |
| Date Type: |
Publication |
| Defense Date: |
15 April 2013 |
| Approval Date: |
24 July 2013 |
| Submission Date: |
12 April 2013 |
| Access Restriction: |
No restriction; Release the ETD for access worldwide immediately. |
| Number of Pages: |
203 |
| Institution: |
University of Pittsburgh |
| Schools and Programs: |
Dietrich School of Arts and Sciences > English |
| Degree: |
PhD - Doctor of Philosophy |
| Thesis Type: |
Doctoral Dissertation |
| Refereed: |
Yes |
| Uncontrolled Keywords: |
Physical Culture Magazine, Bernarr Macfadden, Morris Fishbein,eugenics |
| Date Deposited: |
24 Jul 2013 18:12 |
| Last Modified: |
15 Nov 2016 14:14 |
| URI: |
http://d-scholarship.pitt.edu/id/eprint/19423 |
Available Versions of this Item
-
A Body of Text: Physical Culture and the Marketing of Mobility. (deposited 24 Jul 2013 18:12)
[Currently Displayed]
Metrics
Monthly Views for the past 3 years
Plum Analytics
Actions (login required)
 |
View Item |
![[feed]](/images/feed-icon-32x32.png){kind=icon}