Link to the University of Pittsburgh Homepage
Link to the University Library System Homepage Link to the Contact Us Form

Adapting the scheduling of illustrations and graphs to learners in conceptual physics tutoring

Lipschultz, Michael (2015) Adapting the scheduling of illustrations and graphs to learners in conceptual physics tutoring. Doctoral Dissertation, University of Pittsburgh. (Unpublished)

Primary Text

Download (1MB)


This research investigates how to schedule multiple graphical representations in a dialogue-based conceptual physics tutor. Research on multiple graphical representations in tutoring suggests either frequently switching representations or fading from concrete to abstract representations. However, other research communities suggest that the best representation or scheduling can be dependent on various student and tutoring context factors.

This thesis investigates whether these factors are important when considering a schedule of representations. Three major hypotheses are investigated. H1: that the best representational format for physics concepts is related to properties of the student and the tutoring context. H2: that it is possible to build models that predict the best representational format using student and tutoring context information. H3: that picking the representational format based upon student and tutoring context information will produce better learning gains than not considering student and tutoring context information. Additionally, this work addresses the question of whether multiple representations produce greater learning gains than a single representation (H4).

A first experiment was performed to both investigate H1 and to collect data for H2. ANOVAs showed significant interaction effects in learning between low and high pretesters and between high and low spatial reasoning ability subjects, supporting the first hypothesis. Using the data collected and features describing student and tutoring context information, models were learned to predict when to show illustrations or graphs. That these models could be learned, produce meaningful rules, and outperformed a baseline supports H2. A new modeling algorithm was developed to learn these models by augmenting multiple linear regression to consider certain syntactic constraints.

A third study was run to test H3 and H4 and to extrinsically evaluate the adaptive policy learned. One third of subjects had an adaptive scheduling of representations, one third a fixed alternating scheduling, and one third saw only one representation. In support of H3, subjects with high incoming knowledge sometimes perform better when receiving adaptive scheduling over an alternating scheduling, but there are also counter examples. For H4, it is not supported in general: showing only illustrations is best overall, but in some cases some subjects benefit from multiple representations.


Social Networking:
Share |


Item Type: University of Pittsburgh ETD
Status: Unpublished
CreatorsEmailPitt UsernameORCID
Lipschultz, Michaelmil28@pitt.eduMIL28
ETD Committee:
TitleMemberEmail AddressPitt UsernameORCID
Committee ChairLitman, Diane
Committee MemberHwa, Rebecca
Committee MemberWang, Jingtao
Committee MemberAleven, Vincent
Date: 22 June 2015
Date Type: Publication
Defense Date: 2 December 2014
Approval Date: 22 June 2015
Submission Date: 22 January 2014
Access Restriction: No restriction; Release the ETD for access worldwide immediately.
Number of Pages: 220
Institution: University of Pittsburgh
Schools and Programs: Dietrich School of Arts and Sciences > Computer Science
Degree: PhD - Doctor of Philosophy
Thesis Type: Doctoral Dissertation
Refereed: Yes
Uncontrolled Keywords: tutoring, intelligent tutoring system, student modeling, dialogue, graphs, illustrations, physics
Date Deposited: 22 Jun 2015 12:21
Last Modified: 15 Nov 2016 14:17


Monthly Views for the past 3 years

Plum Analytics

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item