Link to the University of Pittsburgh Homepage
Link to the University Library System Homepage Link to the Contact Us Form

CONTRIBUTIONS TO THE THEORY OF SENSITIVITY AND STABILITY ANALYSIS OF MULTI-CRITERIA DECISION MODELS, WITH APPLICATIONS TO MEDICAL DECISION MAKING

Sava, Magda Gabriela (2016) CONTRIBUTIONS TO THE THEORY OF SENSITIVITY AND STABILITY ANALYSIS OF MULTI-CRITERIA DECISION MODELS, WITH APPLICATIONS TO MEDICAL DECISION MAKING. Doctoral Dissertation, University of Pittsburgh. (Unpublished)

This is the latest version of this item.

[img]
Preview
PDF
Download (2MB) | Preview

Abstract

Patients are faced with multiple alternatives when selecting the preferred method for colorectal cancer screening, and there are multiple criteria to be considered in the decision process. We model patients’ choices using a multi-criteria decision model, and propose a new approach for characterizing the idiosyncratic preference regions for individuals and for groups of similar patients.
We propose an extension of the sensitivity and stability analyses for Analytic Network Models developed by May et al. (2013). We study ANP models to understand how preference regions are created, and how boundaries can be characterized, as the number of criteria increases. For the two-criteria and three-criteria sensitivity and stability analyses, piecewise linear functions and triangular mesh generation, respectively, are used to approximate the boundaries between two adjacent preference regions. We use optimization methods to find the best approximations for the core stability and solution stability regions for cases where two and three criteria are perturbed simultaneously, and there exist an arbitrary number of alternatives. We define sensitivity and stability measures that can be implemented in practice, and that can be considered as a starting point in any medical decision making process.
We apply our newly developed methodology to randomly chosen patients, and show how insights derived from the sensitivity and stability of patients’ preferences might be used within the medical decision making process. Individualized stability analysis is informative, but the generalization to groups of similar patients may be even more important for healthcare providers. Our comparisons reveal that a patient’s age may be an effective discriminating factor that should be taken into consideration when extending the individualized sensitivity and stability analysis to groups of patients with similar characteristics.


Share

Citation/Export:
Social Networking:
Share |

Details

Item Type: University of Pittsburgh ETD
Status: Unpublished
Creators/Authors:
CreatorsEmailPitt UsernameORCID
Sava, Magda Gabrielamgsava@katz.pitt.eduMGS41
ETD Committee:
TitleMemberEmail AddressPitt UsernameORCID
Thesis AdvisorVargas, Luis G.vargas@katz.pitt.edu
Committee MemberDolan, James G.James_Dolan@urmc.rochester.edu
Committee MemberMay, Jerrold H.jerrymay@katz.pitt.edu
Committee MemberShang, Jennifershang@katz.pitt.edu
Committee MemberTjader, Youxu C.yotst1@katz.pitt.edu
Date: 27 September 2016
Date Type: Publication
Defense Date: 26 April 2016
Approval Date: 27 September 2016
Submission Date: 28 July 2016
Access Restriction: No restriction; Release the ETD for access worldwide immediately.
Number of Pages: 128
Institution: University of Pittsburgh
Schools and Programs: Joseph M. Katz Graduate School of Business > Business Administration
Degree: PhD - Doctor of Philosophy
Thesis Type: Doctoral Dissertation
Refereed: Yes
Uncontrolled Keywords: Multi-criteria decision making; AHP/ANP models; medical decision making
Date Deposited: 27 Sep 2016 15:54
Last Modified: 15 Nov 2016 14:35
URI: http://d-scholarship.pitt.edu/id/eprint/29011

Available Versions of this Item


Metrics

Monthly Views for the past 3 years

Plum Analytics


Actions (login required)

View Item View Item