Link to the University of Pittsburgh Homepage
Link to the University Library System Homepage Link to the Contact Us Form

Protocol for a statewide randomized controlled trial to compare three training models for implementing an evidence-based treatment

Herschell, AD and Kolko, DJ and Scudder, AT and Taber-Thomas, S and Schaffner, KF and Hiegel, SA and Iyengar, S and Chaffin, M and Mrozowski, S (2015) Protocol for a statewide randomized controlled trial to compare three training models for implementing an evidence-based treatment. Implementation Science, 10 (1).

[img]
Preview
PDF
Published Version
Available under License : See the attached license file.

Download (784kB) | Preview
[img] Plain Text (licence)
Available under License : See the attached license file.

Download (1kB)

Abstract

© 2015 Herschell et al. Background: Evidence-based treatments (EBTs) are available for treating childhood behavioral health challenges. Despite EBTs' potential to help children and families, they have primarily remained in university settings. Little empirical evidence exists regarding how specific, commonly used training and quality control models are effective in changing practice, achieving full implementation, and supporting positive client outcomes. Methods/design: This study (NIMH RO1 MH095750; ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02543359), which is currently in progress, will evaluate the effectiveness of three training models (Learning Collaborative (LC), Cascading Model (CM), and Distance Education (DE)) to implement a well-established EBT , Parent-Child Interaction Therapy, in real-world, community settings. The three models differ in their costs, skill training, quality control methods, and capacity to address broader implementation challenges. The project is guided by three specific aims: (1) to build knowledge about training outcomes, (2) to build knowledge about implementation outcomes, and (3) to test the differential impact of training clinicians using LC, CM, and DE models on key client outcomes. Fifty (50) licensed psychiatric clinics across Pennsylvania were randomized to one of the three training conditions: (1) LC, (2) CM, or (3) DE. The impact of training on practice skills (clinician level) and implementation/sustainment outcomes (clinic level) are being evaluated at four timepoints coinciding with the training schedule: baseline, 6 (mid), 12 (post), and 24 months (1 year follow-up). Immediately after training begins, parent-child dyads (client level) are recruited from the caseloads of participating clinicians. Client outcomes are being assessed at four timepoints (pre-treatment, 1, 6, and 12 months after the pre-treatment). Discussion: This proposal builds on an ongoing initiative to implement an EBT statewide. A team of diverse stakeholders including state policy makers, payers, consumers, service providers, and academics from different, but complementary areas (e.g., public health, social work, psychiatry), has been assembled to guide the research plan by incorporating input from multidimensional perspective. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02543359


Share

Citation/Export:
Social Networking:
Share |

Details

Item Type: Article
Status: Published
Creators/Authors:
CreatorsEmailPitt UsernameORCID
Herschell, ADadh13@pitt.eduADH13
Kolko, DJ
Scudder, AT
Taber-Thomas, S
Schaffner, KF
Hiegel, SAsah153@pitt.eduSAH153
Iyengar, Sssi@pitt.eduSSI
Chaffin, M
Mrozowski, S
Date: 28 September 2015
Date Type: Publication
Journal or Publication Title: Implementation Science
Volume: 10
Number: 1
DOI or Unique Handle: 10.1186/s13012-015-0324-z
Schools and Programs: Dietrich School of Arts and Sciences > Statistics
School of Medicine > Psychiatry
Refereed: Yes
Date Deposited: 05 Aug 2016 15:37
Last Modified: 02 Feb 2019 15:57
URI: http://d-scholarship.pitt.edu/id/eprint/29143

Metrics

Monthly Views for the past 3 years

Plum Analytics

Altmetric.com


Actions (login required)

View Item View Item