Link to the University of Pittsburgh Homepage
Link to the University Library System Homepage Link to the Contact Us Form

Sex hormone associations with breast cancer risk and the mediation of randomized trial postmenopausal hormone therapy effects

Zhao, S and Chlebowski, RT and Anderson, GL and Kuller, LH and Manson, JAE and Gass, M and Patterson, R and Rohan, TE and Lane, DS and Beresford, SAA and Lavasani, S and Rossouw, JE and Prentice, RL (2014) Sex hormone associations with breast cancer risk and the mediation of randomized trial postmenopausal hormone therapy effects. Breast Cancer Research, 16 (2). ISSN 1465-5411

[img]
Preview
PDF
Published Version
Available under License : See the attached license file.

Download (311kB) | Preview
[img] Plain Text (licence)
Available under License : See the attached license file.

Download (1kB)

Abstract

Introduction: Paradoxically, a breast cancer risk reduction with conjugated equine estrogens (CEE) and a risk elevation with CEE plus medroxyprogesterone acetate (CEE + MPA) were observed in the Women's Health Initiative (WHI) randomized controlled trials. The effects of hormone therapy on serum sex hormone levels, and on the association between baseline sex hormones and disease risk, may help explain these divergent breast cancer findings.Methods: Serum sex hormone concentrations were measured for 348 breast cancer cases in the CEE + MPA trial and for 235 cases in the CEE trial along with corresponding pair-matched controls, nested within the WHI trials of healthy postmenopausal women. Association and mediation analyses, to examine the extent to which sex hormone levels and changes can explain the breast cancer findings, were conducted using logistic regression.Results: Following CEE treatment, breast cancer risk was associated with higher concentrations of baseline serum estrogens, and with lower concentrations of sex hormone binding globulin. However, following CEE + MPA, there was no association of breast cancer risk with baseline sex hormone levels. The sex hormone changes from baseline to year 1 provided an explanation for much of the reduced breast cancer risk with CEE. Specifically, the treatment odds ratio (95% confidence interval) increased from 0.71 (0.43, 1.15) to 0.92 (0.41, 2.09) when the year 1 measures were included in the logistic regression analysis. In comparison, the CEE + MPA odds ratio was essentially unchanged when these year 1 measures were included.Conclusions: Breast cancer risk remains low following CEE use among women having favorable baseline sex hormone profiles, but CEE + MPA evidently produces a breast cancer risk for all women similar to that for women having an unfavorable baseline sex hormone profile. These patterns could reflect breast ductal epithelial cell stimulation by CEE + MPA that is substantially avoided with CEE, in conjunction with relatively more favorable effects of either regimen following a sustained period of estrogen deprivation. These findings may have implications for other hormone therapy formulations and routes of delivery. © 2014 Zhao et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.


Share

Citation/Export:
Social Networking:
Share |

Details

Item Type: Article
Status: Published
Creators/Authors:
CreatorsEmailPitt UsernameORCID
Zhao, S
Chlebowski, RT
Anderson, GL
Kuller, LHKullerL@edc.pitt.eduKULLER
Manson, JAE
Gass, M
Patterson, R
Rohan, TE
Lane, DS
Beresford, SAA
Lavasani, S
Rossouw, JE
Prentice, RL
Date: 26 March 2014
Date Type: Publication
Journal or Publication Title: Breast Cancer Research
Volume: 16
Number: 2
DOI or Unique Handle: 10.1186/bcr3632
Schools and Programs: School of Medicine > Medicine
Refereed: Yes
ISSN: 1465-5411
Date Deposited: 02 Dec 2016 20:38
Last Modified: 30 Oct 2018 13:59
URI: http://d-scholarship.pitt.edu/id/eprint/29584

Metrics

Monthly Views for the past 3 years

Plum Analytics

Altmetric.com


Actions (login required)

View Item View Item