Link to the University of Pittsburgh Homepage
Link to the University Library System Homepage Link to the Contact Us Form

Automated peritoneal lavage: An extremely rapid and safe way to induce hypothermia in post-resuscitation patients

de Waard, MC and Biermann, H and Brinckman, SL and Appelman, YE and Driessen, RH and Polderman, KH and Girbes, ARJ and Beishuizen, A (2013) Automated peritoneal lavage: An extremely rapid and safe way to induce hypothermia in post-resuscitation patients. Critical Care, 17 (1). ISSN 1364-8535

[img]
Preview
PDF
Published Version
Available under License : See the attached license file.

Download (487kB) | Preview
[img] Plain Text (licence)
Available under License : See the attached license file.

Download (1kB)

Abstract

Introduction: Mild therapeutic hypothermia (MTH) is a worldwide used therapy to improve neurological outcome in patients successfully resuscitated after cardiac arrest (CA). Preclinical data suggest that timing and speed of induction are related to reduction of secondary brain damage and improved outcome.Methods: Aiming at a rapid induction and stable maintenance phase, MTH induced via continuous peritoneal lavage (PL) using the Velomedix® Inc. automated PL system was evaluated and compared to historical controls in which hypothermia was achieved using cooled saline intravenous infusions and cooled blankets. Results: In 16 PL patients, time to reach the core target temperature of 32.5°C was 30 minutes (interquartile range (IQR): 19 to 60), which was significantly faster compare to 150 minutes (IQR: 112 to 240) in controls. The median rate of cooling during the induction phase in the PL group of 4.1°C/h (IQR: 2.2 to 8.2) was significantly faster compared to 0.9°C/h (IQR: 0.5 to 1.3) in controls. During the 24-hour maintenance phase mean core temperature in the PL patients was 32.38 ± 0.18°C (range: 32.03 to 32.69°C) and in control patients 32.46 ± 0.48°C (range: 31.20 to 33.63°C), indicating more steady temperature control in the PL group compared to controls. Furthermore, the coefficient of variation (VC) for temperature during the maintenance phase was lower in the PL group (VC: 0.5%) compared to the control group (VC: 1.5%). In contrast to 23% of the control patients, none of the PL patients showed an overshoot of hypothermia below 31°C during the maintenance phase. Survival and neurological outcome was not different between the two groups. Neither shivering nor complications related to insertion or use of the PL method were observed.Conclusions: Using PL in post-CA patients results in a rapidly reached target temperature and a very precise maintenance, unprecedented in clinical studies evaluating MTH techniques. This opens the way to investigate the effects on neurological outcome and survival of ultra-rapid cooling compared to standard cooling in controlled trials in various patient groups.Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01016236. © 2013 de Waard et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.


Share

Citation/Export:
Social Networking:
Share |

Details

Item Type: Article
Status: Published
Creators/Authors:
CreatorsEmailPitt UsernameORCID
de Waard, MC
Biermann, H
Brinckman, SL
Appelman, YE
Driessen, RH
Polderman, KHkhp5@pitt.eduKHP5
Girbes, ARJ
Beishuizen, A
Date: 20 February 2013
Date Type: Publication
Journal or Publication Title: Critical Care
Volume: 17
Number: 1
DOI or Unique Handle: 10.1186/cc12518
Schools and Programs: School of Medicine > Critical Care Medicine
Refereed: Yes
ISSN: 1364-8535
Date Deposited: 06 Oct 2016 15:57
Last Modified: 05 Feb 2019 11:55
URI: http://d-scholarship.pitt.edu/id/eprint/29754

Metrics

Monthly Views for the past 3 years

Plum Analytics

Altmetric.com


Actions (login required)

View Item View Item