Link to the University of Pittsburgh Homepage
Link to the University Library System Homepage Link to the Contact Us Form

Standing orders for influenza and pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccination: Correlates identified in a national survey of U.S. Primary care physicians

Albert, SM and Nowalk, MP and Yonas, MA and Zimmerman, RK and Ahmed, F (2012) Standing orders for influenza and pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccination: Correlates identified in a national survey of U.S. Primary care physicians. BMC Family Practice, 13.

[img]
Preview
PDF
Published Version
Available under License : See the attached license file.

Download (642kB) | Preview
[img] Plain Text (licence)
Available under License : See the attached license file.

Download (1kB)

Abstract

Background: Standing orders programs (SOPs) allow non-physician medical staff to assess eligibility and administer vaccines without a specific physician's order. SOPs increase vaccination rates but are underutilized. Method. In 2009, correlates of SOPs use for influenza vaccine and pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccination (PPV) were assessed in a nationally representative, stratified random sample of U.S. physicians (n = 880) in family and internal medicine who provided office immunization. The response rate was 67%. Physicians reporting no SOPs, only influenza SOPs, and joint influenza and PPV SOPs were compared using multinomial and logistic regression models to examine individual and practice-level correlates. Results: 23% reported using SOPs consistently for both influenza vaccine and PPV, and 20% for influenza vaccination only, with the remainder not using SOPs. Practice-level factors that distinguished practices with joint influenza-PPV SOPs included perceived practice openness to change, strong practice teamwork, access to an electronic medical record, presence of an immunization champion in the practice, and access to nurse/physician assistant staff as opposed to medical assistants alone. Discussion. Physicians in practices with SOPs for both vaccines reported greater awareness of ACIP recommendations and/or Medicare regulations and were more likely to agree that SOPs are an effective way to boost vaccination coverage. However, implementation of both influenza and PPV SOPs was also associated with a variety of practice-level factors, including teamwork, the presence of an immunization champion, and greater availability of clinical assistants with advanced training. Conclusions: Practice-level factors are critical for the adoption of more complex SOPs, such as joint SOPs for influenza and PPV. © 2012 Albert et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.


Share

Citation/Export:
Social Networking:
Share |

Details

Item Type: Article
Status: Published
Creators/Authors:
CreatorsEmailPitt UsernameORCID
Albert, SMsmalbert@pitt.eduSMALBERT0000-0001-6786-9956
Nowalk, MPTNOWALK@pitt.eduTNOWALK0000-0002-1702-2690
Yonas, MA
Zimmerman, RKzimmer@pitt.eduZIMMER0000-0001-5941-6092
Ahmed, F
Date: 21 March 2012
Date Type: Publication
Journal or Publication Title: BMC Family Practice
Volume: 13
DOI or Unique Handle: 10.1186/1471-2296-13-22
Schools and Programs: School of Public Health > Behavioral and Community Health Sciences
School of Medicine > Family Medicine
Refereed: Yes
Article Type: Review
Date Deposited: 20 Oct 2016 18:23
Last Modified: 20 Mar 2024 11:55
URI: http://d-scholarship.pitt.edu/id/eprint/29940

Metrics

Monthly Views for the past 3 years

Plum Analytics

Altmetric.com


Actions (login required)

View Item View Item