Link to the University of Pittsburgh Homepage
Link to the University Library System Homepage Link to the Contact Us Form

Explaining health disparities: evaluating and advancing methodology

Schleiden, Loren J (2017) Explaining health disparities: evaluating and advancing methodology. Master's Thesis, University of Pittsburgh. (Unpublished)

[img]
Preview
PDF
Submitted Version

Download (355kB) | Preview

Abstract

Introduction: Health disparities are a major public health concern. Researchers often seek to explain whether these disparities are attributable to modifiable downstream risk factors that are also predictive of outcomes. Traditionally-used mediation approaches may not be appropriate to explain such disparities, due to the complex nature of socio-demographic factors such as race/ethnicity.
Methods: Aim 1: We carried out a methodological review of the literature. We searched for studies that investigated a racial/ethnic disparity in a health outcome and adjusted for a potential modifiable mediator of the disparity. Out of the 969 studies meeting inclusion criteria, a simple random sample of fifty studies were drawn to undergo thorough data abstraction. Data were abstracted to determine what mediation approaches were employed, if causal language was used to describe these estimates, and if relevant assumptions were considered in justifying this causal language. Aim 2: We also carried out an analysis of National Survey of Family Growth (NSFG) data representing 103,919,318 live singleton births to mothers in the United States. This analysis employed traditional (Difference and Product methods) and general mediation methods (Inverse Probability-Weighted Marginal Structural Models and Structural Transformation) to result in different estimates of how payment method for delivery explained the racial/ethnic disparity in low birth weight.
Results: All studies included in the target review employed traditional mediation approaches, the majority used language that could be interpreted as causal (86%), and none of the studies explicitly addressed assumptions or conditions for interpreting estimates causally. In the analysis of NSFG data, for every 100 births, there were an additional 5.27 low birth weight infants born to non-Hispanic Black mothers, compared to births to non-Hispanic White mothers. Estimates of the counterfactual disparity measure ranged from 1.62 using the product method to 4.66 using the structural transformation method.
Conclusion: Traditional mediation approaches are commonly used to explain racial/ethnic disparities. The use of such traditional approaches to explain disparities along the lines of complex socio-demographic variables may be inappropriate due to underlying assumptions that are likely broken. Considerations of these underlying assumptions and use of appropriate mediation approaches are crucial to understanding the important public health issue of health disparities.


Share

Citation/Export:
Social Networking:
Share |

Details

Item Type: University of Pittsburgh ETD
Status: Unpublished
Creators/Authors:
CreatorsEmailPitt UsernameORCID
Schleiden, Loren Jljs24@pitt.eduljs240000-0002-1236-0295
ETD Committee:
TitleMemberEmail AddressPitt UsernameORCID
Committee ChairNaimi, Ashley Iashley.naimi@pitt.edu
Committee MemberGlynn, Nancy Wglynnn@pitt.edu
Committee MemberThorpe, Carolyn Tctthorpe@pitt.edu
Date: 29 June 2017
Date Type: Publication
Defense Date: 3 April 2017
Approval Date: 29 June 2017
Submission Date: 3 April 2017
Access Restriction: 2 year -- Restrict access to University of Pittsburgh for a period of 2 years.
Number of Pages: 55
Institution: University of Pittsburgh
Schools and Programs: Graduate School of Public Health > Epidemiology
Degree: MS - Master of Science
Thesis Type: Master's Thesis
Refereed: Yes
Uncontrolled Keywords: mediation; health disparities;
Date Deposited: 29 Jun 2017 23:33
Last Modified: 01 May 2019 05:15
URI: http://d-scholarship.pitt.edu/id/eprint/31182

Metrics

Monthly Views for the past 3 years

Plum Analytics


Actions (login required)

View Item View Item