Link to the University of Pittsburgh Homepage
Link to the University Library System Homepage Link to the Contact Us Form

Restorative Justice and the Discipline Gap: Exploring the Impact of Restorative Practices on Racially Disproportional School Discipline

Joseph, Andrea (2018) Restorative Justice and the Discipline Gap: Exploring the Impact of Restorative Practices on Racially Disproportional School Discipline. Doctoral Dissertation, University of Pittsburgh. (Unpublished)

[img] PDF
Restricted to University of Pittsburgh users only until 6 August 2022.

Download (936kB) | Request a Copy

Abstract

School suspensions and expulsions are frequently used throughout U.S. schools as a form of discipline or behavior modification. However, for the last four decades, students of color have been disproportionately excluded from school compared to their White peers. To address this disparity, districts across the nation are now utilizing relationship building interventions such as restorative practices to repair broken relationships in the school community. Schools using restorative practices are generally able to significantly reduce the total number of suspensions; however, racial disparities often remain. Guided by ecological systems theory and critical race theory, this mixed-methods study examined factors that contributed to the persistent discipline-gap at a school implementing restorative practices. Data are drawn from interviews, training observations, classroom observations, instrument data, and pre-post intervention discipline data. As demonstrated in the literature, findings demonstrate an overall reduction in school suspensions during the intervention year. However, the discipline gap remained leaving Black males 1.7 times more likely and Black females 1.3 times more likely to be suspended compared to all other students. Within gender, Black females had three times the suspension risk making the Black female discipline gap greater than the Black male discipline gap. A contributing factor to this racial disproportionality was the race-neutral implementation of the intervention. As a race-neutral intervention, it did not account for the structural and interpersonal factors that sustain racial disparities. Further, findings suggest that punitive discipline policies and variable quality of intervention delivery conflicted with the relationship building aims of restorative practices. In all, an array of social, structural and implementation barriers impacted the intended delivery of the intervention. Implications for intervention research, policy, and school social work practice are discussed.


Share

Citation/Export:
Social Networking:
Share |

Details

Item Type: University of Pittsburgh ETD
Status: Unpublished
Creators/Authors:
CreatorsEmailPitt UsernameORCID
Joseph, AndreaAnj40@pitt.eduAnj40
ETD Committee:
TitleMemberEmail AddressPitt UsernameORCID
Committee ChairGoodkind, Sarasara.goodkind@pitt.edu
Committee MemberWallace, Johnjohnw@pitt.edu
Committee MemberHuguley, JamesHUGULEY@pitt.edu
Committee MemberAnne, Gregoryannegreg@gsapp.rutgers.edu
Committee MemberWoodson, Ashleywoodsona@missouri.edu
Date: 3 August 2018
Date Type: Submission
Defense Date: 19 April 2018
Approval Date: 6 August 2018
Submission Date: 3 August 2018
Access Restriction: 4 year -- Restrict access to University of Pittsburgh for a period of 4 years.
Number of Pages: 224
Institution: University of Pittsburgh
Schools and Programs: School of Social Work > Social Work
Degree: PhD - Doctor of Philosophy
Thesis Type: Doctoral Dissertation
Refereed: Yes
Uncontrolled Keywords: School Suspensions; Racially Disproportional School Suspensions; Critical Race Theory; School Social Work; Restorative Practices; Restorative Justice; Discipline Gap
Date Deposited: 06 Aug 2018 18:13
Last Modified: 06 Aug 2018 18:13
URI: http://d-scholarship.pitt.edu/id/eprint/35100

Metrics

Monthly Views for the past 3 years

Plum Analytics


Actions (login required)

View Item View Item