Link to the University of Pittsburgh Homepage
Link to the University Library System Homepage Link to the Contact Us Form

Optical theory and feminine auctoritas within Chaucer's the Tale of Melibee with an English translation of Albertanus of Brescia's Liber consolationis et consilii in full

Fox, Madeline Rose (2021) Optical theory and feminine auctoritas within Chaucer's the Tale of Melibee with an English translation of Albertanus of Brescia's Liber consolationis et consilii in full. Undergraduate Thesis, University of Pittsburgh. (Unpublished)

[img]
Preview
PDF
Download (689kB) | Preview

Abstract

There is an immediate discrepancy between Chaucer’s the Tale of Melibee and its base text, Albertanus of Brescia’s Liber consolationis et consilii: Sophie’s wounds. Chaucer does not include the eyes in the list of her wounds, whereas Albertanus of Brescia does. This discrepancy is often thought to be a mere scribal error, causing this aspect of the translation to be overlooked. However, evidence shows that this difference in translation is almost certainly not a scribal error. There is only one known French manuscript that replaces the word “yeux” with “piez.” It is both unlikely that Chaucer used this manuscript and that he overlooked this mistake. Therefore, this was a conscious choice of Chaucer’s. This unlocks an entirely new and intricate layer of optical theory and feminine auctoritas within the tale. Allowing the eyes to remain unharmed, Chaucer creates an opportunity for Prudence and her feminine wisdom to take center stage. The story’s predominantly feminine voice is reminiscent of that of Boethius’ Lady Philosophy as well as other female personifications of the time. However, Prudence’s prose is distinct, and one of humanity rather than abstraction. Whereas a female personification like Lady Philosophy speaks in musical verse and empty proverb, Prudence puts meaning behind her words through the innately human quality of deduction. Most importantly, Prudence’s words are presented in prose rather than verse, allowing her speech to act as standard dialogue. It is only the presence of eyes within the tale that allows this strong female figure to own her own voice. Applying medieval optical theory to the Tale of Melibee in this way allows for a deep analysis of Prudence’s wisdom as well as her authoritative role in her medieval marriage.


Share

Citation/Export:
Social Networking:
Share |

Details

Item Type: University of Pittsburgh ETD
Status: Unpublished
Creators/Authors:
CreatorsEmailPitt UsernameORCID
Fox, Madeline Rosemrf68@pitt.edumrf68
ETD Committee:
TitleMemberEmail AddressPitt UsernameORCID
Committee ChairMcDermott, Ryanrmcdermott@pitt.edu
Committee MemberJohnson, Hannahhrj4@pitt.edu
Committee MemberHoenig, Christinacmh159@pitt.edu
Committee MemberCopeland, Ritarcopelan@sas.upenn.edu
Date: 12 April 2021
Date Type: Publication
Defense Date: 30 March 2021
Approval Date: 12 April 2021
Submission Date: 10 April 2021
Access Restriction: No restriction; Release the ETD for access worldwide immediately.
Number of Pages: 135
Institution: University of Pittsburgh
Schools and Programs: University Honors College
Dietrich School of Arts and Sciences > English
Degree: BPhil - Bachelor of Philosophy
Thesis Type: Undergraduate Thesis
Refereed: Yes
Uncontrolled Keywords: A study of medieval optics, feminine authority and power, medieval marriage politics, and allegory
Date Deposited: 12 Apr 2021 15:53
Last Modified: 12 Apr 2021 15:53
URI: http://d-scholarship.pitt.edu/id/eprint/40592

Metrics

Monthly Views for the past 3 years

Plum Analytics


Actions (login required)

View Item View Item