Link to the University of Pittsburgh Homepage
Link to the University Library System Homepage Link to the Contact Us Form

METROPOLITAN BATTLEFIELDS: URBAN TOPOGRAPHY AND THE WEAPONIZATION OF GOVERNANCE IN BAGHDAD

BISBEE, DANIEL CHARLES (2021) METROPOLITAN BATTLEFIELDS: URBAN TOPOGRAPHY AND THE WEAPONIZATION OF GOVERNANCE IN BAGHDAD. Doctoral Dissertation, University of Pittsburgh. (Unpublished)

[img]
Preview
PDF
Download (1MB) | Preview

Abstract

Following the 2003 invasion of Iraq, challenges to the US-led reconstruction escalated into a complex conflict over control of the capital city of Baghdad. The Battle for Baghdad involved military combat, mass-casualty terrorism, extreme criminality, and communal strife, as well as welfare provision, civic outreach, economic development, and local politics. State and nonstate actors used bullets, bombs, and their ability to control the provision and denial of city services to residents in their attempts to achieve a range of strategic aims. During this battle, the city provided both the location for the conflict and the means to wage it – an arena and an arsenal.
This study constructs a theoretical framework for analyzing both the spatial and instrumental aspects of urban environments during conflict, demonstrating how governance operates across networks of physical installations and political institutions. Exploiting vulnerabilities to governance systems, combatants pursue organizational aims, compete against rivals, and challenge state authority.
The trajectory of the Battle for Baghdad was shaped by dynamic relationships among its belligerents and a complex urban topography of territorial, demographic, and infrastructural features. A three-part analysis of the Battle for Baghdad evaluates how the reconstruction policies of the US-led Coalition converged with the insurgencies of al-Qaeda in Iraq (AQI) and Jaish al-Mahdi (JAM) to produce a complex conflict in which these combatants weaponized governance to assert control over Baghdad’s urban topography. Evaluation of combatant tactics produces a typology for categorizing efforts as catastrophic or concentrated denial, and legitimate, illicit, or alternative provision of services.
Reflecting new approaches to the analysis of urban environments and political violence, this study aims to build bridges between those who understand cities and those who understand conflict. Concluding with recommendations for future research, this study aims to inform discussions on order, conflict, and violence, by highlighting how systems of urban infrastructure influence complex conflict on a metropolitan battlefield.


Share

Citation/Export:
Social Networking:
Share |

Details

Item Type: University of Pittsburgh ETD
Status: Unpublished
Creators/Authors:
CreatorsEmailPitt UsernameORCID
BISBEE, DANIEL CHARLESDCB27@PITT.EDUDCB270000-0002-5741-4365
ETD Committee:
TitleMemberEmail AddressPitt UsernameORCID
Committee ChairWILLIAMS, PHILridgway1@pitt.edu
Committee MemberMANNING, PATRICKpmanning@pitt.edu
Committee MemberMURTAZASHVILI, JENNIFER BRICKjmurtaz@pitt.edu
Committee MemberSEYBOLT, TAYLORseybolt@pitt.edu
Date: 4 June 2021
Date Type: Publication
Defense Date: 28 April 2021
Approval Date: 4 June 2021
Submission Date: 13 May 2021
Access Restriction: No restriction; Release the ETD for access worldwide immediately.
Number of Pages: 260
Institution: University of Pittsburgh
Schools and Programs: Graduate School of Public and International Affairs > Public and International Affairs
Degree: PhD - Doctor of Philosophy
Thesis Type: Doctoral Dissertation
Refereed: Yes
Uncontrolled Keywords: URBAN WARFARE, POLITICAL VIOLENCE, GOVERNANCE, IRAQ, BAGHDAD, COUNTERINSURGENCY, INSURGENCY, INFRASTRUCTURE
Date Deposited: 04 Jun 2021 11:58
Last Modified: 04 Jun 2021 11:58
URI: http://d-scholarship.pitt.edu/id/eprint/41084

Metrics

Monthly Views for the past 3 years

Plum Analytics


Actions (login required)

View Item View Item