Link to the University of Pittsburgh Homepage
Link to the University Library System Homepage Link to the Contact Us Form

Epstein-Barr virus, infectious mononucleosis, and posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorders.

Nalesnik, MA and Starzl, TE (1994) Epstein-Barr virus, infectious mononucleosis, and posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorders. Transplantation science, 4 (1). 61 - 79. ISSN 1063-2964

Accepted Version
Available under License : See the attached license file.

Download (4MB) | Preview
[img] Plain Text (licence)
Available under License : See the attached license file.

Download (1kB)


PTLD may be considered as an "opportunistic cancer" in which the immunodeficiency state of the host plays a key role in fostering the environment necessary for abnormal lymphoproliferation. The following discussion reflects our own current thoughts regarding events which may result in PTLD and its sequelae. Many of the individual steps have not been rigorously proved or disproved at this point in time. Following transplantation and iatrogenic immunosuppression, the host:EBV equilibrium is shifted in favor of the virus. Most seronegative patients will become infected either via the graft or through natural means; seropositive patients will begin to shed higher levels of virus and may become secondarily superinfected via the graft. There is a "grace" period of approximately one month posttransplant before increased viral shedding begins. PTLD is almost never seen during this interval. In many cases infection continues to be silent whereas in rare individuals there is an overwhelming polyclonal proliferation of infected B lymphocytes. This is the parallel of infectious mononucleosis occurring in patients with a congenital defect in virus handling (X-linked lymphoproliferative disorder). It is possible that transplant patients with this presentation also suffer a defect in virus handling. In other cases excessive iatrogenic immunosuppression may paralyze their ability to respond to the infection. With CsA and FK506 regimens, individual tumors may occur within a matter of months following transplant. The short time of incubation suggests that these are less than fully developed malignancies. It may be that local events conspire to allow outgrowth of limited numbers of B-lymphocyte clones. A cytokine environment favoring B-lymphocyte growth may be one factor and differential inhibition by the immuno-suppressive drugs of calcium-dependent and -independent B-cell stimulation may be another. In addition, there is some evidence that CsA itself may inhibit apoptosis within B cells. Since most patients do not develop PTLDs, an additional signal(s) for B-cell stimulation may be required. Indeed, it is possible that the virus may simply serve to lower the threshold for B-cell activation and/or provide a survival advantage to these cells. The ability of individual cell clones to evade a weakened immune system may set into play a Darwinian type of competition in which the most rapidly proliferating cells with the least number of antigenic targets predominate. In this regard, differences in host HLA types may determine the repertoire of viral antigens which are subject to attack.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)


Social Networking:
Share |


Item Type: Article
Status: Published
CreatorsEmailPitt UsernameORCID
Nalesnik, MAnalesnik@pitt.eduNALESNIK
Starzl, TEtes11@pitt.eduTES11
Centers: Other Centers, Institutes, Offices, or Units > Thomas E. Starzl Transplantation Institute
Date: 1 January 1994
Date Type: Publication
Journal or Publication Title: Transplantation science
Volume: 4
Number: 1
Page Range: 61 - 79
Institution: University of Pittsburgh
Refereed: Yes
ISSN: 1063-2964
Article Type: Review
Other ID: uls-drl:31735062121789, Starzl CV No. 1828
Date Deposited: 08 Apr 2010 17:31
Last Modified: 29 Jan 2019 15:55


Monthly Views for the past 3 years

Plum Analytics

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item