Link to the University of Pittsburgh Homepage
Link to the University Library System Homepage Link to the Contact Us Form

KNOWLEDGE FLOW AND VALUE CREATION: INTEGRATING STRUCTURAL EMBEDDEDNESS AND KNOWLEDGE EMBEDDEDNESS IN ALLIANCE NETWORKS

Yao, Beiqing (2006) KNOWLEDGE FLOW AND VALUE CREATION: INTEGRATING STRUCTURAL EMBEDDEDNESS AND KNOWLEDGE EMBEDDEDNESS IN ALLIANCE NETWORKS. Doctoral Dissertation, University of Pittsburgh. (Unpublished)

[img]
Preview
PDF
Primary Text

Download (678kB) | Preview

Abstract

Scholars in a variety of disciplines, including organizational theory, strategic management, and economics, have devoted substantial attention to the question: why are some firms more innovative than others? It has been largely accepted that when the knowledge base of an industry is both complex and expanding and the sources of expertise are widely dispersed, the locus of innovation will be found in networks of inter-organizational collaborations than individual firms. Strategy researchers have recently begun to explore how inter-firm networking affects organizational innovation performance, and reported intriguing yet conflicting findings. Drawing perspectives from strategic alliance, social networks, and technology innovation, I proposed an integrative framework to investigate the combined effects of a firm's network centrality and structural hole on organizational innovation performance. Furthermore, I examine the innovation performance both in terms of innovation rate and innovation value. I conducted a longitudinal study on a population of firms from 1990 to 1999 in pharmaceutical industry (SIC 2834). The results of the study indicate that: 1) Network centrality helps a firm to increase its rate of innovation, and structural hole helps to improve its value of innovation, while both effects are non-linear. 2) Network centrality positively moderates the relationship between structural hole and innovation value. 3) Structural hole negatively moderates the effect of network centrality on innovation rate. The joint effects suggest that firms with advantageous network positions are more capable of making wise technology selections and focusing their efforts on innovations of greater value.


Share

Citation/Export:
Social Networking:
Share |

Details

Item Type: University of Pittsburgh ETD
Status: Unpublished
Creators/Authors:
CreatorsEmailPitt UsernameORCID
Yao, Beiqingemery.yao@uky.edu
ETD Committee:
TitleMemberEmail AddressPitt UsernameORCID
Committee ChairMcEvily, Susansmcevily@katz.pitt.edu
Committee MemberKrackhardt, Davidkrack@andrew.cmu.edu
Committee MemberPrescott, Johnprescott@katz.pitt.eduPRESCOTT
Committee MemberMadhavan, Ravirmadhavan@katz.pitt.eduRAM115
Committee MemberTsai, Wenpinwtsai@psu.edu
Date: 22 May 2006
Date Type: Completion
Defense Date: 14 October 2004
Approval Date: 22 May 2006
Submission Date: 14 March 2006
Access Restriction: No restriction; Release the ETD for access worldwide immediately.
Institution: University of Pittsburgh
Schools and Programs: Joseph M. Katz Graduate School of Business > Business Administration
Degree: PhD - Doctor of Philosophy
Thesis Type: Doctoral Dissertation
Refereed: Yes
Uncontrolled Keywords: Social Networks; Strategic Alliance; Technology and Innovation
Other ID: http://etd.library.pitt.edu/ETD/available/etd-03142006-164552/, etd-03142006-164552
Date Deposited: 10 Nov 2011 19:32
Last Modified: 15 Nov 2016 13:37
URI: http://d-scholarship.pitt.edu/id/eprint/6496

Metrics

Monthly Views for the past 3 years

Plum Analytics


Actions (login required)

View Item View Item