Link to the University of Pittsburgh Homepage
Link to the University Library System Homepage Link to the Contact Us Form

COMPARISON OF METHODS INCORPORATING COVARIATES INTO AFFECTED SIB PAIR LINKAGE ANALYSIS

Tsai, Hui-Ju (2004) COMPARISON OF METHODS INCORPORATING COVARIATES INTO AFFECTED SIB PAIR LINKAGE ANALYSIS. Doctoral Dissertation, University of Pittsburgh. (Unpublished)

[img]
Preview
PDF
Primary Text

Download (2MB) | Preview

Abstract

Complex diseases such as type 2 diabetes, hypertension and psychiatric disorders have been major public health problems in US. In order to increase the power in the linkage analysis of complex traits, genetic heterogeneity has to be taken into account. During the past few years, several methods have been proposed for dealing with this issue by incorporating covariate information into the affected sib pair (ASP) analysis. However, it is still not clear how these approaches perform under different gene-environment (G x E) interactions. The covariate statistics evaluated in this study are: (1) mixture model; (2) general conditional-logistic model (LODPAL); (3) multinomial logistic regression models (MLRM under no dominance, no additive and min-max restriction); (4) extension of the maximum-likelihood-binomial approach (MLB); (5) ordered-subset analysis (OSA with three different rank orders: high-to-low, low-to-high and optimal-slice); (6) logistic regression modeling (COVLINK). Based on the chromosome-based approach, we have written simulation programs to generate data under various G x E models and disease models. We first define the empirical statistical significance thresholds using C2, the environmental risk factor, under the null hypothesis. We then evaluate the power of the covariate statistics when different covariates are used. We also compare the performance of the covariate statistics with the model-free methods (Sall and Spair). In all three G x E interaction models, most covariate methods perform better when using C1, the covariate with G x E interaction effect, than when using C2 or the random noise covariate C3, except for MLB and the low-to-high OSA method. Comparing with the model-free methods (using Sall as the baseline), mixture model and the high-to-low OSA method perform the best of the covariate statistics when using C1. However, when using C2 or C3, most covariate statistics provide less power than Sall. Only MLB has comparable power to Sall across all genetic models. According to our results, in different G x E interactions, one should apply the appropriate covariate statistic and include the suitable type of covariates carefully.


Share

Citation/Export:
Social Networking:
Share |

Details

Item Type: University of Pittsburgh ETD
Status: Unpublished
Creators/Authors:
CreatorsEmailPitt UsernameORCID
Tsai, Hui-Juhut1@pitt.eduHUT1
ETD Committee:
TitleMemberEmail AddressPitt UsernameORCID
Committee ChairWeeks, Daniel Edweeks@watson.hgen.pitt.eduWEEKS
Committee MemberDevlin, Berniedevlinbj@upmc.eduDEVLINBJ
Committee MemberFeingold, Eleanoreleanor.feingold@hgen.pitt.eduFEINGOLD
Committee MemberBarmada, M Michaelmichael.barmada@hgen.pitt.eduBARMADA
Committee MemberFerrell, Robert Erobert.ferrell@hgen.pitt.eduRFERRELL
Date: 29 April 2004
Date Type: Completion
Defense Date: 2 March 2004
Approval Date: 29 April 2004
Submission Date: 21 April 2004
Access Restriction: No restriction; Release the ETD for access worldwide immediately.
Institution: University of Pittsburgh
Schools and Programs: Graduate School of Public Health > Human Genetics
Degree: PhD - Doctor of Philosophy
Thesis Type: Doctoral Dissertation
Refereed: Yes
Uncontrolled Keywords: covariate; linkage analysis; power
Other ID: http://etd.library.pitt.edu/ETD/available/etd-04212004-132621/, etd-04212004-132621
Date Deposited: 10 Nov 2011 19:39
Last Modified: 19 Dec 2016 14:35
URI: http://d-scholarship.pitt.edu/id/eprint/7401

Metrics

Monthly Views for the past 3 years

Plum Analytics


Actions (login required)

View Item View Item