Link to the University of Pittsburgh Homepage
Link to the University Library System Homepage Link to the Contact Us Form

EVALUATION OF TITANIUM ULTRALIGHT MANUAL WHEELCHAIRS USING ANSI/RESNA STANDARDS

Liu, Hsin Yi (2008) EVALUATION OF TITANIUM ULTRALIGHT MANUAL WHEELCHAIRS USING ANSI/RESNA STANDARDS. Master's Thesis, University of Pittsburgh. (Unpublished)

[img]
Preview
PDF
Primary Text

Download (1MB) | Preview

Abstract

A series of commercially available titanium ultralight wheelchairs were tested using ANSI/RESNA testing procedures, and their durability was compared with previously tested aluminum ultralight wheelchairs and light-weight wheelchairs. Three of each of the following titanium wheelchairs were tested: Invacare-TopEnd, Invacare-A4, Quickie-Ti, and TiLite-ZRA. The Quickie-Ti wheelchairs had the most forward and rearward center of gravity adjustability. All of the titanium wheelchairs passed the forward braking effectiveness test, but two chairs of each model tipped backward before the platform inclining to 7 degree in the rearward braking effectiveness test. All titanium wheelchairs passed the impact strength tests, but two failed in the static strength tests: two Invacare-TopEnd wheelchairs and one Invacare-A4 wheelchair failed due to deformation of the armrest mounting plates, and the handgrips of the TiLite-ZRA wheelchairs slid off the push handles. Two Invacare-A4 and one Invacare-TopEnd successfully completed the double drum and curb drop tests, but the remaining 9 wheelchairs failed prematurely. No significant differences were found in the number of the equivalent cycles or the value among the four models. The titanium ultralight wheelchairs had less equivalent cycles and value than the aluminum ultralight wheelchairs that were tested in a previous study. The failure modes in the static strength tests and the fatigue tests were consistent within the model, and revealed important design issues for each model. Our results suggest that manufacturers need to perform more careful analyses before commercializing new products.


Share

Citation/Export:
Social Networking:
Share |

Details

Item Type: University of Pittsburgh ETD
Status: Unpublished
Creators/Authors:
CreatorsEmailPitt UsernameORCID
Liu, Hsin Yihsl16@pitt.edu, hsinyipt86@gmail.comHSL16
ETD Committee:
TitleMemberEmail AddressPitt UsernameORCID
Committee ChairCooper, Rory A.rcooper@pitt.eduRCOOPER
Committee MemberPearlman, Jonjlp46@pitt.eduJLP46
Committee MemberCooper, Rosemariecooperrm@pitt.eduCOOPERRM
Date: 8 September 2008
Date Type: Completion
Defense Date: 20 March 2008
Approval Date: 8 September 2008
Submission Date: 24 June 2008
Access Restriction: 5 year -- Restrict access to University of Pittsburgh for a period of 5 years.
Institution: University of Pittsburgh
Schools and Programs: School of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences > Health and Rehabilitation Sciences
Degree: MS - Master of Science
Thesis Type: Master's Thesis
Refereed: Yes
Uncontrolled Keywords: durability; failure; fatigue tests; reference standards; wheelchair
Other ID: http://etd.library.pitt.edu/ETD/available/etd-06242008-115100/, etd-06242008-115100
Date Deposited: 10 Nov 2011 19:48
Last Modified: 15 Nov 2016 13:45
URI: http://d-scholarship.pitt.edu/id/eprint/8182

Metrics

Monthly Views for the past 3 years

Plum Analytics


Actions (login required)

View Item View Item