Link to the University of Pittsburgh Homepage
Link to the University Library System Homepage Link to the Contact Us Form

The Fact of Modern Mathematics: Geometry, Logic, and Concept Formation in Kant and Cassirer

Heis, Jeremy Richard (2008) The Fact of Modern Mathematics: Geometry, Logic, and Concept Formation in Kant and Cassirer. Doctoral Dissertation, University of Pittsburgh. (Unpublished)

[img]
Preview
PDF
Primary Text

Download (3MB) | Preview

Abstract

It is now commonly accepted that any adequate history of late nineteenth and early twentieth century philosophy - and thus of the origins of analytic philosophy - must take seriously the role of Neo-Kantianism and Kant interpretation in the period. My dissertation is a contribution to our understanding of this interesting but poorly understood stage in the history of philosophy. Kant's theory of the concepts, postulates, and proofs of geometry was informed by philosophical reflection on diagram-based geometry in the Greek synthetic tradition. However, even before the widespread acceptance of non-Euclidean geometry, the projective revolution in nineteenth century geometry eliminated diagrams from proofs and introduced "ideal" elements that could not be given a straightforward interpretation in empirical space. A Kantian like the very early Russell felt forced to regard the ideal elements as convenient fictions. The Marburg Neo-Kantians—the philosophical school that included Ernst Cassirer (1874-1945)—thought that philosophy, as "transcendental logic," needed to take the results of established pure mathematics as a "fact," not a fiction. Cassirer therefore updates Kant by rejecting the "Transcendental Aesthetic" and by using elements in Richard Dedekind's foundations of arithmetic to rework Kant's idea that the geometrical method is the "construction of concepts". He further argues that geometry is "synthetic" because it progresses when mathematicians introduce new structures (like the complex projective plane) that are not contained in the old structures, but unify them under a new point-of-view. This new "Kantian" theory of modern mathematics, Cassirer argues, is inconsistent with the traditional theory of concept formation by abstraction. Drawing on earlier Neo-Kantian interpretations, Cassirer argues that Kant's theory of concepts as rules undermines the traditional theory of concept formation and gives a "transcendental" defense of the new logic of Frege and Russell. (In an appendix, I discuss the contemporaneous accounts of concept formation in Gottlob Frege and Hermann Lotze.)


Share

Citation/Export:
Social Networking:
Share |

Details

Item Type: University of Pittsburgh ETD
Status: Unpublished
Creators/Authors:
CreatorsEmailPitt UsernameORCID
Heis, Jeremy Richardjeremyheis@gmail.comjeremyheis@gmail.com
ETD Committee:
TitleMemberEmail AddressPitt UsernameORCID
Committee ChairWilson, Mark
Committee MemberGupta, Anil
Committee MemberAvigad, Jeremy
Committee MemberManders, Kenneth
Committee MemberEngstrom, Stephen
Ricketts, Thomas
Date: 24 January 2008
Date Type: Completion
Defense Date: 5 September 2007
Approval Date: 24 January 2008
Submission Date: 23 August 2007
Access Restriction: No restriction; Release the ETD for access worldwide immediately.
Institution: University of Pittsburgh
Schools and Programs: Dietrich School of Arts and Sciences > Philosophy
Degree: PhD - Doctor of Philosophy
Thesis Type: Doctoral Dissertation
Refereed: Yes
Uncontrolled Keywords: Ernst Cassirer; Gottlob Frege; Hermann Lotze; Immanuel Kant; Neo-Kantianism; Projective Geometry
Other ID: http://etd.library.pitt.edu/ETD/available/etd-08232007-132755/, etd-08232007-132755
Date Deposited: 10 Nov 2011 20:01
Last Modified: 30 Apr 2012 17:07
URI: http://d-scholarship.pitt.edu/id/eprint/9248

Metrics

Monthly Views for the past 3 years

Plum Analytics


Actions (login required)

View Item View Item