Link to the University of Pittsburgh Homepage
Link to the University Library System Homepage Link to the Contact Us Form

MODELING OF TRANSCRANIAL ELECTRICAL STIMULATION BY FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS

Rath, William Tyler (2007) MODELING OF TRANSCRANIAL ELECTRICAL STIMULATION BY FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS. Master's Thesis, University of Pittsburgh. (Unpublished)

[img]
Preview
PDF
Primary Text

Download (4MB) | Preview

Abstract

Transcranial electrical stimulation (TES) appears to be an effective way to monitor the spinal cord while patients are under anesthesia. This method is sensitive to changes in the functioning of the corticospinal tracts. It is a reliable and fast indicator of the status of the spinal cord during surgery. In this research, we develop a model to describe the intracranial voltage, electric field, and activation function distributions associated with transcranial electrical stimulation. Poisson's equation is utilized with boundary conditions modeled after a real human head.The models, which are a two dimensional (2D) circular volume conductor and a three dimensional (3D) spherical volume conductor, include the inhomogeneous aspects of a human head. These inhomogeneous characteristics impact the flow of current due to volume conductivity differences between the scalp, skull, cerebrospinal fluid, and the brain itself. These results for a theoretical head model show the systematic differences between 2D and 3D models which has not been examined for TES. Knowing the differences between 2D and 3D simulations allows the inference for the results of the 3D case using a 2D model, which saves time and computational resources.A comparison of the voltages, electric fields, and activation functions is examined to determine the differences between the 2D and 3D models for each quantity. Parameterizations are also performed to show the impact of the different layers of the head. The results from the potentials, electric fields, activation function and parameterization calculations are used to infer the systematic differences between 2D and 3D models. This analysis of computational models for TES has not been performed before and is beneficial to diagnosing which areas of the brain are being stimulated during TES and gives an idea of the stimulation threshold needed to achieve muscle responses via TES.


Share

Citation/Export:
Social Networking:
Share |

Details

Item Type: University of Pittsburgh ETD
Status: Unpublished
Creators/Authors:
CreatorsEmailPitt UsernameORCID
Rath, William Tylerwtr3@pitt.eduWTR3
ETD Committee:
TitleMemberEmail AddressPitt UsernameORCID
Committee ChairSun, Minguimrsun@neuronet.pitt.eduDRSUN
Committee CoChairJournee, Louisljournee@wanadoo.nl
Committee CoChairSclabassi, Robertbobs@neuronet.pitt.edu
Committee MemberCrammond, Donaldcrammond@pitt.eduCRAMMOND
Committee MemberBalzer, Jefferyjeb23@pitt.eduJEB23
Date: 31 January 2007
Date Type: Completion
Defense Date: 20 November 2006
Approval Date: 31 January 2007
Submission Date: 23 October 2006
Access Restriction: No restriction; Release the ETD for access worldwide immediately.
Institution: University of Pittsburgh
Schools and Programs: Swanson School of Engineering > Bioengineering
Degree: MSBeng - Master of Science in Bioengineering
Thesis Type: Master's Thesis
Refereed: Yes
Uncontrolled Keywords: Electric Field; Electric Potential; Transcranial Electrical Stimulation; Activation Functions; Finite Element Method
Other ID: http://etd.library.pitt.edu/ETD/available/etd-10232006-164912/, etd-10232006-164912
Date Deposited: 10 Nov 2011 20:03
Last Modified: 15 Nov 2016 13:50
URI: http://d-scholarship.pitt.edu/id/eprint/9506

Metrics

Monthly Views for the past 3 years

Plum Analytics


Actions (login required)

View Item View Item