Link to the University of Pittsburgh Homepage
Link to the University Library System Homepage Link to the Contact Us Form

INSTITUTIONAL STRUCTURE AND POLICY CHANGE: PENSION REFORMS IN BELGIUM, FRANCE, SWEDEN, AND THE UNITED KINGDOM.

Marier, Patrik (2003) INSTITUTIONAL STRUCTURE AND POLICY CHANGE: PENSION REFORMS IN BELGIUM, FRANCE, SWEDEN, AND THE UNITED KINGDOM. Doctoral Dissertation, University of Pittsburgh. (Unpublished)

[img]
Preview
PDF
Primary Text

Download (4MB) | Preview

Abstract

This dissertation seeks to answer the question: what impedes/drives policy change? This objective is sought by analyzing the policy process behind recent pension reforms in four European countries (Belgium, France, Sweden and the UK). Despite similar pressures, policy responses have been quite varied. The UK and, to a lesser extent, Sweden have introduced substantial changes to their pension system (programmatic reforms) while France and Belgium have resorted to altering existing parameters (parametric reforms) to resolve the same issue. The dissertation offers an institutional model, comprised of two ordering principles, to explain this divergence. The first ordering principle states that the type of administrative structure associated with public pension schemes defines the strength and legitimacy of actors in the reform process. More specifically, the presence of social partners in the reform process, as a result of their management and financial roles, constrains governments to adopt parametric reforms while their absence is more conducive to a reform that can overhaul the pension system. The second ordering principle claims that the higher the number of veto players (political parties) required to pass a legislation the less likely programmatic reforms are to occur. Based on these two ordering principles, a typology of policy change is created. It is argued that a high number of veto players can still result in a substantial change if the political parties are able to carry legislation without external influence, but will likely result in policies near the status quo if social partners are involved.


Share

Citation/Export:
Social Networking:
Share |

Details

Item Type: University of Pittsburgh ETD
Status: Unpublished
Creators/Authors:
CreatorsEmailPitt UsernameORCID
Marier, Patrikpmarier@brockport.edu
ETD Committee:
TitleMemberEmail AddressPitt UsernameORCID
Committee ChairPeters, B. Guybgpeters@pitt.eduBGPETERS
Committee MemberSbragia, Alberta Msbragia@pitt.eduSBRAGIA
Committee MemberSavoie, Donalddsavoie@umoncton.ca
Committee MemberHallerberg, Markhallerb@pitt.eduHALLERB
Date: 10 March 2003
Date Type: Completion
Defense Date: 3 December 2002
Approval Date: 10 March 2003
Submission Date: 11 December 2002
Access Restriction: No restriction; Release the ETD for access worldwide immediately.
Institution: University of Pittsburgh
Schools and Programs: Dietrich School of Arts and Sciences > Political Science
Degree: PhD - Doctor of Philosophy
Thesis Type: Doctoral Dissertation
Refereed: Yes
Uncontrolled Keywords: Belgium; comparative politics; France; pensions; public policy; reforms; retrenchment; Sweden; UK; welfare state; social policy; welfare
Other ID: http://etd.library.pitt.edu:80/ETD/available/etd-12112002-073336/, etd-12112002-073336
Date Deposited: 10 Nov 2011 20:10
Last Modified: 15 Nov 2016 13:54
URI: http://d-scholarship.pitt.edu/id/eprint/10309

Metrics

Monthly Views for the past 3 years

Plum Analytics


Actions (login required)

View Item View Item