Link to the University of Pittsburgh Homepage
Link to the University Library System Homepage Link to the Contact Us Form

CONCURRENT AND CONSTRUCT VALIDITY OF THREE ALTERNATIVE VERSIONS OF THE STANDARD OMNI CYCLE SCALE OF PERCEIVED EXERTION IN YOUNG ADULT MALES

Panzak, George L. (2013) CONCURRENT AND CONSTRUCT VALIDITY OF THREE ALTERNATIVE VERSIONS OF THE STANDARD OMNI CYCLE SCALE OF PERCEIVED EXERTION IN YOUNG ADULT MALES. Doctoral Dissertation, University of Pittsburgh. (Unpublished)

[img]
Preview
PDF (Bookmarks inserted)
Primary Text

Download (1MB) | Preview

Abstract

Purpose: To examine, (a) both the concurrent and construct validity of three Alternative Adult OMNI-Cycle Scale formats that eliminate the zero category as an exercise response and (b) to determine if the alternative formats identify perceptual signal dominance integration.
Methods: Sixteen young adult males performed four load incremented cycle ergometer tests. Concurrent validity was established by correlating RPE from the three alternative scales with corresponding VO2 and HR responses. Construct validity was established by correlating RPE from the three alternative scales with RPE from the original scale. Perceptual signal dominance and signal integration were examined by a within subjects three factor ANOVA. All perceptual and physiological data were measured at 40%, 65%, and 90% VO2peak.
Results: Correlations between RPE (Alt I, II, III) and both VO2 and HR ranged from r = 0.81 to 0.94 (P < 0.001). Correlations between RPE (Alt I, II, III) and RPE (Original Scale) ranged from r = 0.93 to 0.98 (P < 0.001). RPE-Legs were higher (P < 0.05) than RPE-Chest for all three Alternative Scales. RPE-Overall did not differ from the mean of RPE-Legs & RPE-Chest.
Conclusion: Findings supported concurrent and construct validity of the three Alternative Adult OMNI-Cycle Scale formats where the zero category was eliminated or represented a resting state and not an exercise response. Both perceptual signal dominance and integration were supported for all three Alternative Scales.


Share

Citation/Export:
Social Networking:
Share |

Details

Item Type: University of Pittsburgh ETD
Status: Unpublished
Creators/Authors:
CreatorsEmailPitt UsernameORCID
Panzak, George L.glpanzak@alumni.pitt.eduGLP22
ETD Committee:
TitleMemberEmail AddressPitt UsernameORCID
Committee ChairRobertson, Robert J.marrjr@verizon.net
Committee MemberGoss , Fredrick L.goss@pitt.edu GOSS
Committee MemberNagle, Elizabeth F.nagle@pitt.eduNAGLE
Committee MemberRubinstein, Elaine N.rubinstein2012@gmail.com
Date: 10 January 2013
Date Type: Publication
Defense Date: 12 December 2012
Approval Date: 10 January 2013
Submission Date: 8 January 2013
Access Restriction: No restriction; Release the ETD for access worldwide immediately.
Number of Pages: 192
Institution: University of Pittsburgh
Schools and Programs: School of Education > Health and Physical Activity
Degree: PhD - Doctor of Philosophy
Thesis Type: Doctoral Dissertation
Refereed: Yes
Uncontrolled Keywords: Ratings of Perceived Exertion OMNI Scales Concurrent Validity Construct Validity Signal Dominance Signal Integration Exercise Intensity Self-regulation
Additional Information: Contact Email Address: glpanzak@alumni.pitt.edu -- Additional Acknowledgements: Tetyana Shyrchenko, undergraduate assistant, University of Pittsburgh Department of Health & Physical Activity --- Howard B. Moss, MD, Associate Director for Clinical and Translational Research with the National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism, National Institutes of Health --- Mauro G. Di Pasquale, MD, Assistant Professor, University of Toronto 1988-1998 --- The late Stella Yaksich, PhD, RN, Assistant Dean, University of Pittsburgh School of Nursing
Date Deposited: 10 Jan 2013 14:36
Last Modified: 15 Nov 2016 14:08
URI: http://d-scholarship.pitt.edu/id/eprint/17089

Metrics

Monthly Views for the past 3 years

Plum Analytics


Actions (login required)

View Item View Item