Link to the University of Pittsburgh Homepage
Link to the University Library System Homepage Link to the Contact Us Form

Grouping practices in award-winning middle schools: A study of Pennsylvania Don Eichhorn Schools to Watch middle schools

Rozzo, John/T (2015) Grouping practices in award-winning middle schools: A study of Pennsylvania Don Eichhorn Schools to Watch middle schools. Doctoral Dissertation, University of Pittsburgh. (Unpublished)

[img]
Preview
PDF
Primary Text

Download (1MB)

Abstract

Grouping practices in schools continue to be an ongoing debate in the research literature. It remains unclear what the most appropriate grouping practices are for middle schools when grouping students to form interdisciplinary teams. The research base on grouping practices for middle level education is limited in terms of recent evidence. The onset of the middle school movement that began nearly half a century ago offered guidance and direction for appropriate grouping practices for middle schools. However, the landscape of public education has changed significantly over the past five decades. This study surveyed 14 middle school principals of award-winning middle schools (Don Eichhorn Schools to Watch) in the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania. This investigation sought to determine 1) What are the most prevalent criteria used by principals of award-winning middle schools when grouping students to form interdisciplinary teams? 2) What are the beliefs of principals of award-winning middle schools relative to ability grouping practices? 3) How aligned are the philosophy and practices of principals of award-winning middle schools in relation to ability grouping? A survey with 44 questions was administered via a telephone call with each participant. Findings revealed that random assignment and ability grouping were the most prevalent criteria used by middle school
principals. However, teacher recommendation and students’ prior academic record received the highest mean rank when principals were asked to rank in order the six criteria investigated in this study in terms of importance. Principals’ beliefs for ability grouping were relatively consistent with the practices within their respective schools. The subject area of mathematics received the most support for grouping by ability followed by English language arts. The subject areas of science and social studies received almost unanimous endorsement for randomly assigning students. Coincidentally, the subject areas of math and English language arts are state tested subject areas in consecutive years in middle school. Further research would help to determine if differing beliefs across subject areas are the result of high-stakes testing and increased emphasis on student performance data. Moreover, future research would help to identify the influence such measures have on grouping students to form interdisciplinary teams.


Share

Citation/Export:
Social Networking:
Share |

Details

Item Type: University of Pittsburgh ETD
Status: Unpublished
Creators/Authors:
CreatorsEmailPitt UsernameORCID
Rozzo, John/Tjtr31@pitt.eduJTR31
ETD Committee:
TitleMemberEmail AddressPitt UsernameORCID
Committee ChairTrovato, Charlenetrovato@pitt.eduTROVATO
Committee MemberKerr, Mary Margaretmmkerr@pitt.eduMMKERR
Committee ChairBickel, Williambickel@pitt.eduBICKEL
Committee MemberKirk, Dianedlk31@pitt.eduDLK31
Date: 27 May 2015
Date Type: Publication
Defense Date: 20 March 2015
Approval Date: 27 May 2015
Submission Date: 19 April 2015
Access Restriction: No restriction; Release the ETD for access worldwide immediately.
Number of Pages: 191
Institution: University of Pittsburgh
Schools and Programs: School of Education > Administrative and Policy Studies
Degree: EdD - Doctor of Education
Thesis Type: Doctoral Dissertation
Refereed: Yes
Uncontrolled Keywords: Grouping Practices, Middle School, Ability-Grouping, Principals Beliefs about Ability-Grouping, Middle School Teaming
Date Deposited: 27 May 2015 13:38
Last Modified: 15 Nov 2016 14:27
URI: http://d-scholarship.pitt.edu/id/eprint/24984

Metrics

Monthly Views for the past 3 years

Plum Analytics


Actions (login required)

View Item View Item