Not enough, or maybe too much: Associative deficit vs. hyper-binding models of aging in implicit learning

Hayes, Rebecca A. (2019) Not enough, or maybe too much: Associative deficit vs. hyper-binding models of aging in implicit learning. Doctoral Dissertation, University of Pittsburgh. (Unpublished)

Preview

PDF (Updated version 1/25/19) Submitted Version Download (2MB) | Preview

Abstract

Background. This project investigated the effects of cognitive aging on implicit learning [IL] by testing the competing predictions of two models. One model, the Associative Deficit Hypothesis [ADH], suggests that older adults [OAs] have a specific deficit in their ability to form new relationships in memory, whereas the Hyper-Binding Hypothesis [HBH] suggests that age differences in IL stem from attentional changes in later life.

Aims. We contrasted the predictions of these models by addressing the following aims:
1. Determine whether OAs show more context dependence in IL tasks than younger adults.
2. Determine whether OAs show greater interference from unattended stimuli during IL tasks than younger adults.

Method. We tested context dependence using a novel protocol that manipulated the informativity of objects and their contexts during a word-learning task, and we adapted an established protocol to examine interference from unattended linguistic stimuli.

Results. Neither protocol revealed reliable main effects of age on the learning measure, counter to the predictions of both the ADH and the HBH, although this may be a result of relatively small sample sizes and a wide age range in the older age group. Both experiments provided tentative support of the HBH in their higher-order interactions, but some interactions in the interference protocol contradicted elements of the HBH’s predictions. Post-experimental interviews suggested that participants completed the contextual dependence protocol implicitly but may have been explicitly aware of the patterns present in the interference protocol. Future studies should focus on narrowing the age range of older participants and increasing sample sizes, and in the case of the interference protocol, separating effects of different sources of interference (i.e. interference from attended stimuli versus interference from unattended stimuli.)

---

Share

Citation/Export:	Select format... Citation - Text Citation - HTML Endnote BibTex Dublin Core OpenURL MARC (ISO 2709) METS MODS EP3 XML Reference Manager Refer
Social Networking:	Share |

---

Details

Item Type:	University of Pittsburgh ETD
Status:	Unpublished
Creators/Authors:	Creators Email Pitt Username ORCID Hayes, Rebecca A. rahayes89@gmail.com rah51@pitt.edu
ETD Committee:	Title Member Email Address Pitt Username ORCID Committee Chair Dickey, Michael Walsh mdickey@pitt.edu mdickey Committee Member Nokes, Timothy nokes@pitt.edu nokes Committee Member Shaiman, Susan shaiman@pitt.edu shaiman Committee Member Warren, Tessa tessa@pitt.edu tessa
Date:	30 January 2019
Date Type:	Publication
Defense Date:	19 November 2018
Approval Date:	30 January 2019
Submission Date:	14 November 2018
Access Restriction:	No restriction; Release the ETD for access worldwide immediately.
Number of Pages:	183
Institution:	University of Pittsburgh
Schools and Programs:	School of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences > Communication Science and Disorders
Degree:	PhD - Doctor of Philosophy
Thesis Type:	Doctoral Dissertation
Refereed:	Yes
Uncontrolled Keywords:	Cognitive Aging, Implicit Learning, Associative Binding, Inhibition
Date Deposited:	30 Jan 2019 14:38
Last Modified:	30 Jan 2019 14:38
URI:	http://d-scholarship.pitt.edu/id/eprint/35673

Available Versions of this Item

• Not enough, or maybe too much: Associative deficit vs. hyper-binding models of aging in implicit learning. (deposited 30 Jan 2019 14:38) [Currently Displayed]

---

Metrics

Monthly Views for the past 3 years

Plum Analytics

---

Actions (login required)

View Item