Link to the University of Pittsburgh Homepage
Link to the University Library System Homepage Link to the Contact Us Form

Contentious Coalitions, Movement Divisions, and Strategic Action Fields. Factors Motivating and Unlikely Alliance of Environmental Organizations and Gas Companies.

Ogrodnik, Corinne (2020) Contentious Coalitions, Movement Divisions, and Strategic Action Fields. Factors Motivating and Unlikely Alliance of Environmental Organizations and Gas Companies. Doctoral Dissertation, University of Pittsburgh. (Unpublished)

This is the latest version of this item.

[img]
Preview
PDF
Download (1MB) | Preview

Abstract

My dissertation explores the factors motivating the formation of a contentious alliance of environmental movement organizations and major gas corporations. Utilizing Fligstein and McAdam’s (2012) theoretical framework of strategic action fields, I argue that a field-level analysis helps to contextualize the strategic decision-making environmental organizations engaged in as they surveyed broader societal and political conditions for deciding whether to support or oppose the coalition for advancing their goals. Additionally, I engage aspects of Whittier’s (2018) typology of frenemy relationship structures to link the interaction of environmental actors with the dynamics of contention that occurred within the field as a result of the collaboration.

By situating organizational factors, such as resource mobilization and the framing processes of individual groups, in a wider network of potential alliance and conflict systems (Klandermans 1997) and proximate fields (Fligstein and McAdam 2012), my analysis shows that, as new collective action frames, identities, and practices emerged within the environmental field, uncertainty seeped into the shared understanding of the cultural processes and mission upon which the environmental field had been built. Additionally, my analysis also reveals that participating organizations valued the coalition as an important addition to their tactical repertoire and a necessary strategy to advance the movement’s goals in a politically constrained environment and globalizing world.

Through this project, I seek to contribute to the emerging body of work focused on the intersection of social movement, organizational theory and field level analyses. My research also contributes to the literature on social movement coalitions. Despite the scholarly attention to the formation of coalitions among social movement organizations (Van Dyke and McCammon 2010), little work examines factors that influence organizations to pursue extra-movement, and in some cases, contentious, alliances (Whittier 2018). Finally, my study corroborates key aspects of Whittier’s (2018) frenemy typology. Understanding the coalition as an adversarial collaborative relationship among ideologically opposed actors helps to contextualize the alliance structure as a phenomenon distinct from social movement coalitions.


Share

Citation/Export:
Social Networking:
Share |

Details

Item Type: University of Pittsburgh ETD
Status: Unpublished
Creators/Authors:
CreatorsEmailPitt UsernameORCID
Ogrodnik, Corinnecro9@pitt.educro9
ETD Committee:
TitleMemberEmail AddressPitt UsernameORCID
Committee ChairStaggenborg, Suzannesuzstagg@pitt.edusuzstagg
Committee MemberMarkoff, Johnjm2@pitt.edujm2
Committee MemberBrush, Lisalbrush@pitt.edulbrush
Committee MemberKearns, Kevinkkearns@pitt.edukkearns
Date: 8 June 2020
Date Type: Publication
Defense Date: 25 March 2020
Approval Date: 8 June 2020
Submission Date: 5 April 2020
Access Restriction: No restriction; Release the ETD for access worldwide immediately.
Number of Pages: 173
Institution: University of Pittsburgh
Schools and Programs: Dietrich School of Arts and Sciences > Sociology
Degree: PhD - Doctor of Philosophy
Thesis Type: Doctoral Dissertation
Refereed: Yes
Uncontrolled Keywords: Environmental Movement, Coalitions, Fracking, Center for Sustainable Shale Development
Date Deposited: 08 Jun 2020 16:49
Last Modified: 08 Jun 2020 16:49
URI: http://d-scholarship.pitt.edu/id/eprint/38954

Available Versions of this Item

  • Contentious Coalitions, Movement Divisions, and Strategic Action Fields. Factors Motivating and Unlikely Alliance of Environmental Organizations and Gas Companies. (deposited 08 Jun 2020 16:49) [Currently Displayed]

Metrics

Monthly Views for the past 3 years

Plum Analytics


Actions (login required)

View Item View Item