Link to the University of Pittsburgh Homepage
Link to the University Library System Homepage Link to the Contact Us Form

Dark Money Darker? IRS Shutters Collection of Donor Data

Hackney, Philip (2021) Dark Money Darker? IRS Shutters Collection of Donor Data. The Florida Tax Review, 25 (Fall 2). 141 - 215. ISSN 1066-3487

[img]
Preview
PDF
Draft Version

Download (437kB) | Preview
[img] Plain Text (licence)
Download (1kB)

Abstract

The IRS ended a long-time practice of requiring most nonprofits to disclose substantial donor names and addresses on the nonprofit annual tax return. It is largely seen as a battle over campaign finance rather than tax enforcement. Two of the nonprofits involved, social welfare organizations and business leagues, are referred to as “dark money” organizations because they allow individuals to influence elections while maintaining donor anonymity. Many in the campaign finance community are concerned that this change means wealthy donors can avoid campaign finance laws and have no reason to fear being discovered. In this Article, I focus on whether the information is needed for the enforcement of the tax law and/or to support ancillary legal goals. I contend the IRS ought to collect this substantial donor information as it did for over 79 years. Though the collection of donor information may not be essential for groups such as social clubs, fraternities and sororities, and mutual ditch companies, the collection of this information non-publicly by the IRS is important in both enforcing tax-exempt requirements and in enforcing the tax law generally. Tax law prohibits the distribution of earnings from a nonprofit to those who control the organization. Substantial donors are classic suspects for seeking such improper receipts through their control. Thus, the information is key to IRS auditors. Considering the deficient budget of the IRS to ensure a properly enforced Code, the failure to collect that information puts the IRS in a disadvantaged position. While as a democratic matter, there may be some modest benefit from alleviating donors from the worry that the government will know about their political contributions, the harm to those who are not able to make use of these structures, the harm to those who are deprived of information regarding the biases associated with particular political activity, and the harm to the belief that the tax, campaign finance, and nonprofit law will be enforced equally upon all, is more significant. With these considerations in mind, the IRS and Treasury ought to rescind its most recent guidance on this matter. If not, Congress ought to require this information be disclosed by law.


Share

Citation/Export:
Social Networking:
Share |

Details

Item Type: Article
Status: Published
Creators/Authors:
CreatorsEmailPitt UsernameORCID
Hackney, PhilipPHACKNEY@pitt.eduPHACKNEY0000-0003-0826-250X
Date: 29 April 2021
Date Type: Acceptance
Journal or Publication Title: The Florida Tax Review
Volume: 25
Number: Fall 2
Publisher: Florida Tax Review
Page Range: 141 - 215
Schools and Programs: School of Law > Law
School of Law > Law > Faculty Publications
Refereed: Yes
ISSN: 1066-3487
Article Type: Research Article
Date Deposited: 09 Jul 2021 20:12
Last Modified: 22 Dec 2023 11:55
URI: http://d-scholarship.pitt.edu/id/eprint/41319

Metrics

Monthly Views for the past 3 years

Plum Analytics


Actions (login required)

View Item View Item