Link to the University of Pittsburgh Homepage
Link to the University Library System Homepage Link to the Contact Us Form

THE AUTISM SPECTRUM DISORDERS / VACCINE LINK DEBATE: A HEALTH SOCIAL MOVEMENT

Kerr, Margaret Anna (2009) THE AUTISM SPECTRUM DISORDERS / VACCINE LINK DEBATE: A HEALTH SOCIAL MOVEMENT. Doctoral Dissertation, University of Pittsburgh. (Unpublished)

[img]
Preview
PDF (The Autism Spectrum Disorders / Vaccine Link Debate: A Health Social Movement)
Primary Text

Download (1MB) | Preview
[img]
Preview
PDF (Letter to Moms against Mercury)
Supplemental Material

Download (1MB) | Preview

Abstract

Over the past ten years, the parents and loved ones of thousands of individuals afflicted with Autism Spectrum Disorders (ASD) have mobilized around the idea that vaccines play a causative role in ASDs. The US Federal government and Western mainstream medicine refute this, claiming evidence refutes any causal link between vaccines and ASD. The result has been a heated dispute between ASD/vaccine link (ASD/VL) activists and mainstream medicine, both claiming legitimacy based on their own scientific research. To examine this controversy and why ASD/VL activists continue to mobilize around a scientific hypothesis that has been largely disproved, I surveyed and conducted in-depth interviews with ASD/VL activists and examined artifacts from the movement. Utilizing the theoretical framework on Health Social Movements (HSM) developed by Phil Brown and theories on boundary work developed by Thomas Gieryn I examined how and why ASD/VL activists, in collaboration with politicians and scientists, organized a movement to prove there is significant evidence showing a causative link between vaccines and ASDs. I explored how mobilization occurred around several key events including the US Congressional hearings on vaccine safety, the Immunization Safety Review Committee hearings, reports published by the Institute of Medicine, and the release of the Simpsonwood Retreat transcript. I found that while ASD/VL activists became lay experts and used scientific evidence to build their argument, they depended on their own experiential knowledge to inform their personal beliefs on ASD causation and treatment. My findings have significant impact for the study of health social movements and the study of contested illnesses.


Share

Citation/Export:
Social Networking:
Share |

Details

Item Type: University of Pittsburgh ETD
Status: Unpublished
Creators/Authors:
CreatorsEmailPitt UsernameORCID
Kerr, Margaret Annamak24@pitt.eduMAK24
ETD Committee:
TitleMemberEmail AddressPitt UsernameORCID
Committee ChairMarx, Johnjmarx@pitt.eduJMARX
Committee MemberMarkoff, Johnjm2@pitt.eduJM2
Committee MemberRodriguez, Kerikeri.rodriguez@va.gov
Committee MemberSchneirov, Mattschneirov@duq.edu
Committee MemberCoontz, Phyllispcoontz@pitt.eduPCOONTZ
Date: 30 September 2009
Date Type: Completion
Defense Date: 6 May 2009
Approval Date: 30 September 2009
Submission Date: 30 April 2009
Access Restriction: No restriction; Release the ETD for access worldwide immediately.
Institution: University of Pittsburgh
Schools and Programs: Dietrich School of Arts and Sciences > Sociology
Degree: PhD - Doctor of Philosophy
Thesis Type: Doctoral Dissertation
Refereed: Yes
Uncontrolled Keywords: democratizing science; popular epidemology; boundary disputes; health social movements
Other ID: http://etd.library.pitt.edu/ETD/available/etd-04302009-115908/, etd-04302009-115908
Date Deposited: 10 Nov 2011 19:43
Last Modified: 15 Nov 2016 13:43
URI: http://d-scholarship.pitt.edu/id/eprint/7746

Metrics

Monthly Views for the past 3 years

Plum Analytics


Actions (login required)

View Item View Item