Bateman, Oliver
(2012)
Law, Society, and Judicial Politics: State Supreme Courts and the Pursuit of Educational Equity.
Doctoral Dissertation, University of Pittsburgh.
(Unpublished)
This is the latest version of this item.
Abstract
Since the late 1970s, state supreme courts have demonstrated an increased willingness to intervene in disputes on a host of issues ranging from defamation to budget deficits. Activists of all stripes now pursue their agendas in the context of what Richard Nixon dubbed the “New Federalism,” and education reform—a function traditionally handled by state and local governments—has occupied much of their attention. While a considerable amount of academic work has focused quite narrowly on either education policy or supreme court decision-making, few scholars have yet examined the intersection between the two; i.e., how have state and federal judges made education policy, and what reasons have they provided to justify their actions. For historians of education, law enters this story only peripherally as they focus on matters such as test scores and physical plant investments. Legal historians analyze the ratio decidendi on which each decision was based, trying to determine whether a particular constitutional clause or juridical argument impelled the result.
However, the complex and evolving relationship between race and class—seemingly indissoluble in the American setting—that plays out in the context of these school funding disputes cannot be captured by a single method of analysis or monocausal explanation. By placing state supreme court decisions on school finance from the late 20th century in the context of constitutional framing and caselaw from the 19th, and weaving together judicial opinions, lawyers’ pleadings, law review articles, and transcripts of interviews with state supreme court justices and appellate lawyers, I hope to produce a detailed history of legal conflicts over school funding that will fill any extant lacunae. As policymakers at the state level attempt to forge more socioeconomically equitable and racially inclusive systems of education, it behooves them to contemplate the haphazard, contentious, and at times fructifying nature of these highly politicized judicial decisions.
Share
| Citation/Export: |
|
| Social Networking: |
|
Details
| Item Type: |
University of Pittsburgh ETD
|
| Status: |
Unpublished |
| Creators/Authors: |
|
| ETD Committee: |
|
| Date: |
12 June 2012 |
| Date Type: |
Publication |
| Defense Date: |
6 April 2012 |
| Approval Date: |
12 June 2012 |
| Submission Date: |
11 April 2012 |
| Access Restriction: |
3 year -- Restrict access to University of Pittsburgh for a period of 3 years. |
| Number of Pages: |
189 |
| Institution: |
University of Pittsburgh |
| Schools and Programs: |
Dietrich School of Arts and Sciences > History |
| Degree: |
PhD - Doctor of Philosophy |
| Thesis Type: |
Doctoral Dissertation |
| Refereed: |
Yes |
| Uncontrolled Keywords: |
law, education, law and society, school finance policy, school finance litigation, state supreme courts, judicial politics, new judicial federalism, legal history, history of education |
| Date Deposited: |
12 Jun 2012 18:34 |
| Last Modified: |
15 Nov 2016 13:57 |
| URI: |
http://d-scholarship.pitt.edu/id/eprint/11865 |
Available Versions of this Item
-
Law, Society, and Judicial Politics: State Supreme Courts and the Pursuit of Educational Equity. (deposited 12 Jun 2012 18:34)
[Currently Displayed]
Metrics
Monthly Views for the past 3 years
Plum Analytics
Actions (login required)
 |
View Item |
![[feed]](/images/feed-icon-32x32.png){kind=icon}