Homar, Katie S.
(2014)
Prose Declaimers: British Romantic Essayists and Classical Rhetoric.
Doctoral Dissertation, University of Pittsburgh.
(Unpublished)
Abstract
Prose Declaimers argues that major romantic essayists repurposed classical rhetoric in their experimental prose. Although they did not identify as rhetoricians, they repurpose practices, such as declamation, to reinvent themselves as “prose declaimers” whose texts resist easy identification with the period’s political agendas. These essayists invest literary writing with the community-building functions of rhetoric even as they differentiate themselves from political orators.
By revealing romantic essayists' adaptations of classical rhetoric, Prose Declaimers complicates rhetoricians’ conversations about epideictic rhetoric, or the rhetoric of community-building and celebration. I argue that the romantic essayists were modern epideictic rhetors who transformed the mode from the celebration of shared ideals into a means of orchestrating competing political perspectives in a modern society. My research demonstrates the versatility of epideictic rhetoric in the nineteenth century and reintroduces its resources for rhetoricians and literary scholars.
The opening chapters situate Romantic essayists in the transformations of rhetoric and literature at the turn of the nineteenth century. The third chapter argues that Coleridge’s Friend refigures literary prose as modern epideictic rhetoric. Chapters 4 and 5 trace the development of Hazlitt’s rhetorical theory and practice from his early Eloquence of the British Senate to The Spirit of the Age. Hazlitt criticizes the corrupt deployments of rhetoric in parliament, schools, and periodicals, and he repurposes the practices of these institutions to develop his politically oppositional prose. In Chapter 6, I argue that Charles Lamb adapts rhetorical exercises to magazine readers in his Elia essays. Chapter 7 examines De Quincey’s rhetorical theory and practice as responses to the innovative Blackwood’s Magazine. De Quincey’s redefinition of “rhetoric” as bravura mind-play anticipates Victorian configurations of literature and rhetoric.
Share
| Citation/Export: |
|
| Social Networking: |
|
Details
| Item Type: |
University of Pittsburgh ETD
|
| Status: |
Unpublished |
| Creators/Authors: |
|
| ETD Committee: |
|
| Date: |
29 May 2014 |
| Date Type: |
Publication |
| Defense Date: |
3 February 2014 |
| Approval Date: |
29 May 2014 |
| Submission Date: |
21 March 2014 |
| Access Restriction: |
No restriction; Release the ETD for access worldwide immediately. |
| Number of Pages: |
303 |
| Institution: |
University of Pittsburgh |
| Schools and Programs: |
Dietrich School of Arts and Sciences > English |
| Degree: |
PhD - Doctor of Philosophy |
| Thesis Type: |
Doctoral Dissertation |
| Refereed: |
Yes |
| Uncontrolled Keywords: |
Romanticism, Essayists, Rhetoric, Classical, Hazlitt, Lamb, De Quincey, Coleridge, Prose, British |
| Date Deposited: |
29 May 2014 14:30 |
| Last Modified: |
15 Nov 2016 14:18 |
| URI: |
http://d-scholarship.pitt.edu/id/eprint/20783 |
Metrics
Monthly Views for the past 3 years
Plum Analytics
Actions (login required)
 |
View Item |
![[feed]](/images/feed-icon-32x32.png){kind=icon}