Almeida, Gustavo J
(2016)
RELIABILITY AND RESPONSIVENESS OF PHYSICAL ACTIVITY MEASURES IN INDIVIDUALS AFTER TOTAL KNEE ARTHROPLASTY.
Doctoral Dissertation, University of Pittsburgh.
(Unpublished)
Abstract
Few instruments that measure physical activity (PA) can accurately quantify PA performed at both light and moderate intensities, which is particularly relevant in older adults. Evidence of their reliability and responsiveness to change is limited. The purposes of this study were to: 1) determine test-retest reliability of the Actigraph (ACT), SenseWear Armband (SWA) and the Community Healthy Activities Model Program for Seniors (CHAMPS) questionnaire in assessing free-living PA; and 2) determine the responsiveness to change in PA measured by the three instruments after an exercise program in individuals wih knee osteoarthritis who underwent total knee arthroplasty (TKA).
Test-retest reliability was determined by asking subjects to wear the activity monitors for two weeks and complete the CHAMPS at the end of each week. Reliability was measured using intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC2,k). For responsiveness, subjects wore the activity monitors for one week at baseline and at 6-months, and completed the CHAMPS at the end of each week. Changes in PA and standardized response mean (SRM) were calculated and compared across instruments. Weighted-Kappa (K) was used to determine agreement between the instruments on identifying changes in PA based on measurement error.
Test-retest reliability ranged from moderate to excellent for ACT (ICC=0.75-0.86), and were excellent for SWA (ICC=0.93-0.95) and CHAMPS (ICC=0.86-0.92) in the subjects who reported similar PA during two-weeks. The 95% confidence interval of the ICCs from SWA was the only one within excellent reliability range (0.85-0.98). Results on responsiveness revealed small changes in PA (p>0.05) measured by each instrument after the intervention. SRMs indicated small degree of responsiveness (SRM<0.30). When using the measurement error as a threshold for change in PA, the ACT and SWA agreed on the identification of changes in PA (K=0.36-0.63) and disagreed with the CHAMPS (K≤0.22).
This study provides evidence that the ACT and SWA have better psychometrics than the CHAMPS, and amongst the activity monitors, the SWA showed better psychometrics. Clinicians and researchers can use the results from our studies to make well-informed decisions when selecting instruments to measure free-living PA in individuals with arthritis of the lower extremities.
Share
| Citation/Export: |
|
| Social Networking: |
|
Details
| Item Type: |
University of Pittsburgh ETD
|
| Status: |
Unpublished |
| Creators/Authors: |
|
| ETD Committee: |
|
| Date: |
15 January 2016 |
| Date Type: |
Publication |
| Defense Date: |
24 November 2015 |
| Approval Date: |
15 January 2016 |
| Submission Date: |
5 November 2015 |
| Access Restriction: |
No restriction; Release the ETD for access worldwide immediately. |
| Number of Pages: |
135 |
| Institution: |
University of Pittsburgh |
| Schools and Programs: |
School of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences > Rehabilitation Science |
| Degree: |
PhD - Doctor of Philosophy |
| Thesis Type: |
Doctoral Dissertation |
| Refereed: |
Yes |
| Uncontrolled Keywords: |
Physical activity; knee osteoarthritis; psychometrics; measurement; knee arthroplasty; |
| Date Deposited: |
15 Jan 2016 21:09 |
| Last Modified: |
15 Nov 2016 14:30 |
| URI: |
http://d-scholarship.pitt.edu/id/eprint/26307 |
Metrics
Monthly Views for the past 3 years
Plum Analytics
Actions (login required)
 |
View Item |
![[img]](https://d-scholarship.pitt.edu/style/images/fileicons/application_pdf.png)
![[feed]](/images/feed-icon-32x32.png){kind=icon}