Ferguson, Robert
(2017)
Variations in treatment intensity at end of life: review of evidence and policy and program implications.
Master Essay, University of Pittsburgh.
|
Microsoft Word
Accepted Version
Available under License : See the attached license file.
Download (79kB)
|
|
Plain Text (licence)
Available under License : See the attached license file.
Download (1kB)
|
Abstract
Background: U.S. regions with higher intensity of end-of-life (EOL) care do not have greater patient demand for such treatment, nor do they have better outcomes, mortality, quality of care, or satisfaction. This inefficiency has significant public health importance, because resources for improving the public’s health are limited and must be used wisely. This review categorizes factors associated with variations in EOL treatment intensity and proposes targeted policy and program interventions. Methods: I searched Ovid MEDLINE for peer-reviewed studies that included patients 65 years or older, U.S. hospitals, and an analysis of factors affecting variations in EOL treatment intensity. I categorized these factors based on the socio-ecological framework (SEF). Results: The search produced 23 studies. The SEF individual level factors included age, race, ethnicity, gender, income, advance directives, and written medical orders. The SEF interpersonal factors included patient-doctor familiarity. The SEF community factors included the number of provider connections, primary care-centered networks, area-level competition, percent black admissions, and hospital care intensity level in the area. The SEF institutional factors included providers’ EOL decision-making norms, providers’ EOL treatment styles, organizational norms around do-not-resuscitate (DNR) orders, number of beds and providers, and for-profit compared to public institutions. The SEF policy factors included managed care compared to fee-for-service payment systems. Conclusion: To respond to these factors that explain variations in EOL treatment intensities, training programs for providers on palliative care and EOL conversations should be paired with organizational transformation strategies to affect skills, practices, and cultures. Policymakers should also consider value-based payment policies.
Share
Citation/Export: |
|
Social Networking: |
|
Details
Item Type: |
Other Thesis, Dissertation, or Long Paper
(Master Essay)
|
Status: |
Unpublished |
Creators/Authors: |
|
Contributors: |
Contribution | Contributors Name | Email | Pitt Username | ORCID |
---|
Committee Chair | Barron, Gerald | GBARRON@pitt.edu | UNSPECIFIED | UNSPECIFIED | Committee Member | Barnato, Amber | amber.barnato@pitt.edu | UNSPECIFIED | UNSPECIFIED | Committee Member | Zionts, Nancy | zionts@jhf.org | UNSPECIFIED | UNSPECIFIED |
|
Date: |
20 April 2017 |
Date Type: |
Publication |
Publisher: |
University of Pittsburgh |
Institution: |
University of Pittsburgh |
Schools and Programs: |
School of Public Health > Health Policy & Management |
Degree: |
MPH - Master of Public Health |
Thesis Type: |
Master Essay |
Refereed: |
Yes |
Date Deposited: |
14 Jul 2017 19:34 |
Last Modified: |
31 Jul 2020 19:12 |
URI: |
http://d-scholarship.pitt.edu/id/eprint/30390 |
Metrics
Monthly Views for the past 3 years
Plum Analytics
Actions (login required)
|
View Item |