Link to the University of Pittsburgh Homepage
Link to the University Library System Homepage Link to the Contact Us Form

EVALUATION OF THE PSYCHOMETRIC QUALITY AND VALIDITY OF A STUDENT SURVEY OF INSTRUCTION IN BANGKOK UNIVERSITY, THAILAND

Chamoy, Waritsa (2018) EVALUATION OF THE PSYCHOMETRIC QUALITY AND VALIDITY OF A STUDENT SURVEY OF INSTRUCTION IN BANGKOK UNIVERSITY, THAILAND. Doctoral Dissertation, University of Pittsburgh. (Unpublished)

[img]
Preview
PDF
Download (1MB) | Preview

Abstract

The main purpose of this study was to conduct a validation analysis of student surveys of teaching effectiveness implemented at Bangkok University, Thailand. This study included three phases; survey development, a pilot study, and a full implementation study. Four sources of validity evidence were collected to support intended interpretations and uses of survey scores. To this end, this study evaluated the extent to which the content evidence supported the construct definition of the survey (RQ1), the relationships among survey items and survey components corresponded to the construct dimension (RQ2), the survey exhibited gender differential item functioning (RQ3), and student ratings and a similar measure of teaching quality and student achievement (RQ4) were related. Overall, the student survey demonstrated good psychometric quality and the intended purposes and uses of the survey were supported. Based on expert reviews, the dimensions and survey items were perceived adequate in covering teaching quality, the survey items were perceived to properly assess the associated dimensions, and the response scales were perceived suitable with what was intended to measure. Exploratory factor analysis suggested that the construct of teaching effectiveness as defined in this survey may be unidimensional. Although the results did not support multidimensionality, the dimensions can still be used by individual instructors to evaluate their own teaching. Cronbach’s alpha coefficients were high and supported the internal consistency of the survey. There was no occurrence of gender DIF in this student survey. Therefore, the validity evidence of survey score interpretations was supported since the meaning of survey categories/scales was shared across male and female students. Finally, the results based on relation to other variables showed a strong positive relationship between the student survey and another currently used survey at Bangkok University which was used to evaluate teaching effectiveness for a decade. This could indicate that the student survey was measuring a similar construct of teaching effectiveness.


Share

Citation/Export:
Social Networking:
Share |

Details

Item Type: University of Pittsburgh ETD
Status: Unpublished
Creators/Authors:
CreatorsEmailPitt UsernameORCID
Chamoy, Waritsawac28@pitt.eduWAC280000-0001-8304-089X
ETD Committee:
TitleMemberEmail AddressPitt UsernameORCID
Thesis AdvisorLane, Suzannesl@pitt.eduSL
Committee MemberStone, Clement A.cas@pitt.eduCAS
Committee MemberTerhorst, Laurenlat15@pitt.eduLAT15
Committee MemberMoore, Debra Whitedwm9@pitt.eduDWM9
Date: 24 September 2018
Date Type: Publication
Defense Date: 24 July 2018
Approval Date: 24 September 2018
Submission Date: 21 August 2018
Access Restriction: No restriction; Release the ETD for access worldwide immediately.
Number of Pages: 218
Institution: University of Pittsburgh
Schools and Programs: School of Education > Psychology in Education
Degree: PhD - Doctor of Philosophy
Thesis Type: Doctoral Dissertation
Refereed: Yes
Uncontrolled Keywords: Psychometrics, Validity, Factor analysis, Student survey of instruction, DIF
Date Deposited: 24 Sep 2018 16:55
Last Modified: 24 Sep 2018 16:55
URI: http://d-scholarship.pitt.edu/id/eprint/35242

Metrics

Monthly Views for the past 3 years

Plum Analytics


Actions (login required)

View Item View Item