Link to the University of Pittsburgh Homepage
Link to the University Library System Homepage Link to the Contact Us Form

Explanation, Understanding, and Counterfactual Dependence

Froese, Annika (2022) Explanation, Understanding, and Counterfactual Dependence. Doctoral Dissertation, University of Pittsburgh. (Unpublished)

[img]
Preview
PDF
Download (681kB) | Preview

Abstract

Philosophical accounts of explanations must provide a criterion that distinguishes between information that is accurate but merely descriptive and information that is explanatory. Many philosophers believe that information about counterfactual dependence relations is explanatory. In other words, explanations inform us about what would have been the case had things been different from how they actually were. If my ingestion of aspirin explains why my headache went away, this entails that the headache would not have gone away had I not taken the aspirin. This dissertation explores the limitations of counterfactual accounts of explanation. One challenge is posed by indeterminism. Since an indeterministic process has multiple possible outcomes, we might think that we cannot explain why the actual outcome rather than some counterfactual alternative occurred. I show that this worry is unfounded. A second concern targets not the focus on counterfactual dependence relations, but the focus on explanation. I discuss what I consider to be the strongest argument for the claim that explanation is not necessary for understanding and show that it is unsound. Finally, I contrast understanding that results from grasping a model that traces counterfactual dependence relations with understanding that results from grasping a narrative, showing there are different, possibly competing kinds of explanation.


Share

Citation/Export:
Social Networking:
Share |

Details

Item Type: University of Pittsburgh ETD
Status: Unpublished
Creators/Authors:
CreatorsEmailPitt UsernameORCID
Froese, AnnikaANF111@pitt.eduANF111
ETD Committee:
TitleMemberEmail AddressPitt UsernameORCID
Committee ChairBatterman, Robertrbatterm@pitt.edu
Committee MemberShaw, Jamesjames.a.r.shaw@gmail.com
Committee MemberShumener, Ericaerica.pitt.email@gmail.com
Committee MemberGallow, J. Dmitrijdmitrig22@gmail.com
Date: 13 August 2022
Date Type: Publication
Defense Date: 19 May 2022
Approval Date: 19 November 2024
Submission Date: 13 June 2022
Access Restriction: No restriction; Release the ETD for access worldwide immediately.
Number of Pages: 107
Institution: University of Pittsburgh
Schools and Programs: Dietrich School of Arts and Sciences > Philosophy
Degree: PhD - Doctor of Philosophy
Thesis Type: Doctoral Dissertation
Refereed: Yes
Uncontrolled Keywords: scientific explanation, scientific understanding, brute facts, historical explanation, contrastive explanation, indeterminism, probabilistic explanation
Date Deposited: 19 Nov 2024 16:36
Last Modified: 20 Nov 2024 16:59
URI: http://d-scholarship.pitt.edu/id/eprint/43137

Metrics

Monthly Views for the past 3 years

Plum Analytics


Actions (login required)

View Item View Item