Link to the University of Pittsburgh Homepage
Link to the University Library System Homepage Link to the Contact Us Form

Ethical Decision-Making Regarding Termination in Gestational Carrier Pregnancies

Braverman, Jennifer Anne (2022) Ethical Decision-Making Regarding Termination in Gestational Carrier Pregnancies. Master's Thesis, University of Pittsburgh. (Unpublished)

[img]
Preview
PDF
Download (427kB) | Preview

Abstract

In a typical pregnancy, the pregnant person is the sole decision-maker regarding pregnancy termination. However, in a pregnancy involving a gestational carrier, both the gestational carrier and the intended parents may assert that they ought to have the authority to make decisions regarding pregnancy termination. Fundamentally, gestational surrogacy relies on promises made between gestational carriers and intended parents. These promises create ethical obligations, and as a result, there are circumstances in which the gestational carrier ought to make decisions regarding termination that are in line with the wishes of the intended parents, rather than her own wishes.
Nevertheless, there is a distinction to be made regarding what the gestational surrogate ought to do and what others may compel her to do. Ultimately, the intended parents do not have a right to authorize or refuse termination against the wishes of the gestational carrier. The gestational carrier’s right to bodily autonomy as well as the ethical obligations of third-party medical providers results in a conclusion that the gestational carrier ultimately holds decision-making authority regarding pregnancy termination. Thus, while there are circumstances under which the gestational carrier ought not to exercise her right to make her own decisions regarding pregnancy termination, she always retains that right. Implications of these conclusions for gestational carrier contracts and alternative approaches for avoiding conflict are explored.


Share

Citation/Export:
Social Networking:
Share |

Details

Item Type: University of Pittsburgh ETD
Status: Unpublished
Creators/Authors:
CreatorsEmailPitt UsernameORCID
Braverman, Jennifer Annejab756@pitt.edujab7560000-0001-6380-1129
ETD Committee:
TitleMemberEmail AddressPitt UsernameORCID
Committee ChairWicclair, Markwicclair@pitt.eduwicclair
Committee CoChairParker, Lisalisap@pitt.edulisap
Committee MemberBlake, Valarievalarie.blake@mail.wvu.edu
Date: 13 August 2022
Date Type: Publication
Defense Date: 20 July 2022
Approval Date: 11 November 2024
Submission Date: 21 July 2022
Access Restriction: No restriction; Release the ETD for access worldwide immediately.
Number of Pages: 79
Institution: University of Pittsburgh
Schools and Programs: Dietrich School of Arts and Sciences > Bioethics
Degree: MA - Master of Arts
Thesis Type: Master's Thesis
Refereed: Yes
Uncontrolled Keywords: Ethics, Gestational Carrier, Surrogacy, Abortion, Medical Decision Making, Pregnancy, Pregnancy Termination
Date Deposited: 11 Nov 2024 18:50
Last Modified: 11 Nov 2024 20:46
URI: http://d-scholarship.pitt.edu/id/eprint/43338

Metrics

Monthly Views for the past 3 years

Plum Analytics


Actions (login required)

View Item View Item