Webber, Daniel Frederick
(2023)
Let’s Get Real: Counterfactual Moral Theories in the Actual World.
Doctoral Dissertation, University of Pittsburgh.
(Unpublished)
Abstract
Several prominent moral theories (such as contractualism, rule consequentialism, and Kantianism) ground morality in facts about what would happen if we accepted certain rules or principles. I show how this counterfactual approach fails to do justice to many of the ways in which right and wrong depend on facts about what actually happens. Our actions can be wrong, for instance, because of the risks they impose on those around us, or because they are unfair to others, but I show that contractualism and rule consequentialism have difficulty making sense of this. I also argue that these theories cannot account for the moral relevance of the social rules we have actually adopted. Finally, I argue that Kantians’ explanatory reliance on the counterfactual notion of universalizability leads them to miss the significance of our actual wrongs against others.
Share
Citation/Export: |
|
Social Networking: |
|
Details
Item Type: |
University of Pittsburgh ETD
|
Status: |
Unpublished |
Creators/Authors: |
|
ETD Committee: |
|
Date: |
6 September 2023 |
Date Type: |
Publication |
Defense Date: |
27 June 2023 |
Approval Date: |
6 September 2023 |
Submission Date: |
23 June 2023 |
Access Restriction: |
No restriction; Release the ETD for access worldwide immediately. |
Number of Pages: |
106 |
Institution: |
University of Pittsburgh |
Schools and Programs: |
Dietrich School of Arts and Sciences > Philosophy |
Degree: |
PhD - Doctor of Philosophy |
Thesis Type: |
Doctoral Dissertation |
Refereed: |
Yes |
Uncontrolled Keywords: |
Moral theory, contractualism, rule consequentialism, Kantianism |
Date Deposited: |
07 Sep 2023 01:29 |
Last Modified: |
07 Sep 2023 01:29 |
URI: |
http://d-scholarship.pitt.edu/id/eprint/45025 |
Metrics
Monthly Views for the past 3 years
Plum Analytics
Actions (login required)
|
View Item |