Link to the University of Pittsburgh Homepage
Link to the University Library System Homepage Link to the Contact Us Form

Something old and something new: Wedding recombinant inbred lines with traditional line cross analysis increases power to describe gene interactions

Elnaccash, TW and Tonsor, SJ (2010) Something old and something new: Wedding recombinant inbred lines with traditional line cross analysis increases power to describe gene interactions. PLoS ONE, 5 (4).

[img]
Preview
PDF
Published Version
Available under License : See the attached license file.

Download (128kB) | Preview
[img] Plain Text (licence)
Available under License : See the attached license file.

Download (1kB)

Abstract

In this paper we present a novel approach to quantifying genetic architecture that combines recombinant inbred lines (RIL) with line cross analysis (LCA). LCA is a method of quantifying directional genetic effects (i.e. summed effects of all loci) that differentiate two parental lines. Directional genetic effects are thought to be critical components of genetic architecture for the long term response to selection and as a cause of inbreeding depression. LCA typically begins with two inbred parental lines that are crossed to produce several generations such as F1, F2, and backcrosses to each parent. When a RIL population (founded from the same P1 and P2 as was used to found the line cross population) is added to the LCA, the sampling variance of several nonadditive genetic effect estimates is greatly reduced. Specifically, estimates of directional dominance, additive x additive, and dominance x dominance epistatic effects are reduced by 92%, 94%, and 56% respectively. The RIL population can be simultaneously used for QTL identification, thus uncovering the effects of specific loci or genomic regions as elements of genetic architecture. LCA and QTL mapping with RIL provide two qualitatively different measures of genetic architecture with the potential to overcome weaknesses of each approach alone. This approach provides cross-validation of the estimates of additive and additive x additive effects, much smaller confidence intervals on dominance, additive x additive and dominance x dominance estimates, qualitatively different measures of genetic architecture, and the potential when used together to balance the weaknesses of LCA or RIL QTL analyses when used alone. © 2010 Elnaccash, Tonsor.


Share

Citation/Export:
Social Networking:
Share |

Details

Item Type: Article
Status: Published
Creators/Authors:
CreatorsEmailPitt UsernameORCID
Elnaccash, TW
Tonsor, SJtonsor@pitt.eduTONSOR
Contributors:
ContributionContributors NameEmailPitt UsernameORCID
EditorReitsma, Pieter H.UNSPECIFIEDUNSPECIFIEDUNSPECIFIED
Date: 10 September 2010
Date Type: Publication
Journal or Publication Title: PLoS ONE
Volume: 5
Number: 4
DOI or Unique Handle: 10.1371/journal.pone.0010200
Schools and Programs: Dietrich School of Arts and Sciences > Biological Sciences
Refereed: Yes
MeSH Headings: Arabidopsis--genetics; Epistasis, Genetic; Genes, Plant--genetics; Inbreeding; Quantitative Trait Loci
Other ID: NLM PMC2855707
PubMed Central ID: PMC2855707
PubMed ID: 20419131
Date Deposited: 03 Aug 2012 20:55
Last Modified: 05 Feb 2019 07:55
URI: http://d-scholarship.pitt.edu/id/eprint/13362

Metrics

Monthly Views for the past 3 years

Plum Analytics

Altmetric.com


Actions (login required)

View Item View Item